Healed_IHS
Senior Member
- May 5, 2007
- 962
- 33
- 49
- Faith
- Anglican
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Libertarian
So, your point of view is -- Children should be able to run around on the altar during a funeral.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
\
If we, as Anglicans, make it difficult or uncomfortable for young families with small children to attend our services, we are turning away the future of our Church.
Also, spot onI think it goes deeper than 'the future of our church'. When we fail to make families welcome we are turning away a PART of our church. A crucial part of our church, but nonetheless, part of the same body which we were baptised into. This is crucial anglican theology--if you don't believe the promises you make when these infants are baptised, why do you say 'We do'?
I think what people are saying is that we need to fulfill our baptismal vows to seek and serve Christ in others, which might mean that we have to exercise patience when a child or anyone else makes some noise in church.
May I share a cool experience?
I just got back from the consecration of the new Bishop of Chicago (my former rector and boss).
They held the event in a HUGE arena. What I found wonderful was this: they had specially prepared a place front and center for young children, right in front of the altar. They put down comfy blankets and a labyrinth rug, plenty of crayons and I think I saw some Godly Play materials. There were a couple of welcoming adults to help supervise. The kids who were there spent part of the time being transfixed by all the pointy hats and smoke; and part of the time coloring or stepping on the mat, or almost anything else. It was wonderful to behold!
Call me a lapsed anglican, what ever.So, your point of view is -- Children should be able to run around on the altar during a funeral.
We cannot exclude children simply for the reason that they might do such a thing. As many have already expressed - this kind of thing just doesn't happen in the main.So, your point of view is -- Children should be able to run around on the altar during a funeral.
I do agree that it's common courtesy, should your child start making enough noise that people are not able to hear what is going on (ie screaming), to step outside for a little bit if you can't comfort and settle the child inside. Assuming that you will not be exposed to the elements of course. It's also common courtesy not to glare, frown, make comments under your breath, or outright suggest that parents not bring their children to church, when a child is not completely silent. It's also common courtesy for a church to make efforts to provide ways for it to be easier for parents to bring their children to church, and to welcome children in worship just like everyone else.
There's only so much that we can do based on child's age (like pm said - different ages / different expectations).
As for the glaring... what does the bible say about the way for correction. If people don't amend after 2 people go to them, have the congregation approach the person in error.
Glaring is much more "polite" then excommunication.
Like considerate humans... if the baby starts to cry, the parent "sucks it up" and stands outside until said baby gets pacified.
Why do you have this hostile attitude if your experience is that parents behave according to your expectations in dealing with their children?
The "hostile" attitude is when parent's don't.