What did God have in mind when creating humankind?
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Relationships. Found in Jesus' summary of the law, and in Genesis 1-3What did God have in mind when creating humankind?
Ok. A little simplistic, but its a beginning.Relationships. Found in Jesus' summary of the law, and in Genesis 1-3
Keep in mind, God took a rib from Adam so he could have a relationship with another human, and the two will become one flesh. Before the fall.Ok. A little simplistic, but its a beginning.![]()
Can we keep in mind when thinking this out that had Adam not trangressed there would have been no need for redemption.??![]()
Having gotten that part out of the way, what kind of a relationship do you believe God was after with Adam [mankind] and how do you suppose it was to be arrived at to the satisfaction of God?
Keep in mind, God took a rib from Adam so he could have a relationship with another human, and the two will become one flesh. Before the fall.
What kind of relationship? Deep and intimate. No secrets, complete openness, trust, and love. How was it to be arrived at? That would be different for each person.
Not following your 'logic' here.Since we know what Jesus became, i.e., the first Divine-Human and, as I stated, if Adam had not transgressed there would have been no need for redemption, ergo, Jesus would never have been born, ergo, He would not have been the first Divine-Human, can you still stick with your notion of Adam being created to simply have a "deep and intimate" relationship with God? Certainly God had something of the same intention with Adam as later with Jesus, don't you think? In other words: Jesus succeeded where Adam failed.
Since we know what Jesus became, i.e., the first Divine-Human and, as I stated, if Adam had not transgressed there would have been no need for redemption, ergo, Jesus would never have been born, ergo, He would not have been the first Divine-Human, can you still stick with your notion of Adam being created to simply have a "deep and intimate" relationship with God? Certainly God had something of the same intention with Adam as later with Jesus, don't you think? In other words: Jesus succeeded where Adam failed.
If you're saying that Adam was created to be in perfect relationship with God, and failed, where Christ did not fail, then I agree with that.
But God did create humankind to be in perfect relationship with each other and with Himself, as the Holy Trinity is in relationship with Themselves. In other words - in perfect love.
And God the Son would still have taken on humanity and become the God-Man even if we had not fallen. He would have united humanity to Himself.
Mary
God tells us exactly why we were created, in His Word.
Please read and understand:
[FONT=Arial, Geneva, Helvetica]11 Thou art worthy, O Lord, to receive glory and honour and power: for thou hast created all things, and for thy pleasure they are and were created. --Revelation 4[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Geneva, Helvetica]Simple and to the point.[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, Geneva, Helvetica]SOLI DEO GLORIA.[/FONT]
Very good, Mary. However, Christ was never a Son but the very expression of the heart of God who spoke the worlds into existance, co-equal with Him, second personality of the God-head which Jesus never was until He spoke those words, "It is Finished". Had Adam not transgressed, the privilege of the God-head indwelling him would have fallen instead to him as the new Divine-Human instead of Jesus. It would not have been otherwise needed to be altered by God in His plan/intention by ushering in Jesus to replace Adam.. There would have been no need for redemption. Ergo, Jesus would never have been born.
I know you may believe that violates a whole bunch orthodoxy but try to think it through before consigning me to the pit.......![]()
Too simple since the whole world groans, waiting for the manifestation of the sons of God. What could it possibily mean that we are to be a son of God ... and how is it accomplished in us?
Well, I won't consign you to the pit, but I do disagree with some of that.
Adam could never have become the Divine-Human (and neither can we) in the *same* way as Christ. Christ is True God of True God. Only God could fully unite the Divine with the Human. We can never be God in His Essence. God intends us to become *like* Him through His Energies (Grace, if you like) in what we call Theosis. And in that, we become Fully Human. But we can never become Fully God, as Christ is.
Mary
Oh, okay, that makes sense.Very good, Mary. However, Christ was never a Son but the very expression of the heart of God who spoke the worlds into existance, co-equal with Him, second personality of the God-head which Jesus never was until He spoke those words, "It is Finished". Had Adam not transgressed, the privilege of the God-head indwelling him would have fallen instead to him as the new Divine-Human instead of Jesus. It would not have been otherwise needed to be altered by God in His plan/intention by ushering in Jesus to replace Adam.. There would have been no need for redemption. Ergo, Jesus would never have been born.
I know you may believe that violates a whole bunch orthodoxy but try to think it through before consigning me to the pit.......![]()
I'd say yeah, He was. John 10:30, for starters. And where John says: "And I saw the Spirit of God descend like a dove..."As a human, was Jesus fully God before the Cross?
Becareful here when answering. This is where it can be triicky since His life on earth was meant for something beyond our redemption.
I full well know that in reality; the foreknowedge of God from the beginning of eternity past, He was. However, He was to be proven; He had to be tested as a human that in actuality of His Life, the reality of His Son-ship, Heir-ship and Throne-ship would be- must be summed up and this not simply for us; our salvation, but also for the observing host in the Heavenlies. They are all watching this play out for which, at this time the full ramifications of it all, concerning them, we aren't privy to.
Father's purpose is to populate His Realm with Human-Divinity; man to be as He is, Jesus being the "first of first fruits" in this. That was the Victory He accomplished, not just for us "begotten again" brothers, or for Himself who is now the Head of His "begotten again" brothers but for the Father who desires to have a vast Family of Sons, "begotten again" by the Blood of Jesus. It is for Father, for Himself, and for us. In this is the summation of the Union of John 17, Jesus prays for.
This privilege of becoming the first of first fruits was first given to Adam. He would have become had he not failed in the "Self-renunciation" class of '01.. No rdemption would have been necessary had he passed the test. At some point in time he would have participated in the transfiguration graduation ceremony whereby the Christ of Glory would have entered in his human flesh unto what Jesus later became in His flesh...The first Divine-Human to share/participate in Throneship. The form of the preincarnate Christ of Glory that was intended for the body of Adam, is now in Jesus, an incarnate body of flesh and bone which makes Him now, in actuality, "Christ Jesus"..
There is a difference between Adam and Jesus inasmuch as created Adam had only one [not divine] nature from which he functioned. Jesus had two He was born with. Adam was never anointed to function. Jesus was, by the power of the Holy Ghost. The devil wanted to destroy the Divine Nature of the man Jesus. The only way he could do it was by getting the "Self" of Jesus, His human nature, to sin. Jesus, son of man, was given the task of protecting the Christ of God within Him. We have the record of the account of His wilderness experience that speaks of the solicitations of the enemy. The way Jesus succeeded is for us who are born again [begotten again of the Father], to learn. It is called the "Way of the Cross". If we love the Father with all of our heart, mind, soul, and strength as Jesus did, we will succeed because we will posess the same strengths He posessed, otherwise we will "fall short of the glory of God".. In that day, we will find we are something less than what Father intended us to be.
I'd say yeah, He was. John 10:30, for starters. And where John says: "And I saw the Spirit of God descend like a dove..."
The question becomes even more complex.
Did God know beforehand that Adam was going to sin? Did God plan out sending Jesus Christ the Son to be humanity's redemption before Adam was even created?
Indeed He did know and He did plan it all out beforehand. That is why the Bible says so much about being from before the foundation of the world God knew and He chose. Jesus was always in His Mind but Adam had to be given his chance to be the Son Jesus became.If God is omniscient--all knowing--one would assume God knew about all that was going to happen and planned it all out in the beginning.
If so, the question becomes even more profound. If God KNEW man was going to fall and planned out a salvation plan beforehand, why would God bother to go ahead with the plan and create Adam?
Did God know beforehand that Adam was going to sin?
Did God plan out sending Jesus Christ the Son to be humanity's redemption before Adam was even created?
If God is omniscient--all knowing--one would assume God knew about all that was going to happen and planned it all out in the beginning.
If so, the question becomes even more profound. If God KNEW man was going to fall and planned out a salvation plan beforehand, why would God bother to go ahead with the plan and create Adam?