Read the Rich man and Lazarus. Obviously this must have taken place prior to the ressurection, because the rich man's brother's were still on earth. Yet Lazarus was in heaven. Please explain..
And the reason for the ressurection is to unite our eternal soul with our eternal body. This perfect body and soul, is what Adam was like prior to the fall. This is what the ressurection returns to us.
It's a parable, read the context surrounding it. Many miss this. becasue they do not read the context.
The first thing you have to understand is that this is a parable:
In two ancient Greek manuscripts-theBazae Caulabrigiensis and the koridethiean-Caesarean text-words are included which have been deleted in other translations. Both of the ancient translations begin Luke 16:19 with the word: eipen de kai heteran parabolen, which translated means "And he said also another parable",
A parable is acomparison by sustained resemblence. a parable is an extended simile: the resemblance is usually in one specific characteristic. The likeness or resemblence must always be sought from the essence of the entire context.
The confusion and misunderstanding of the parable in luke lies in the Pharisaic beliefs.
Luke 16:14 indicates that this parable is addressed to the Pharisees.
So Jesus wisely judged the Pharisees out of their own mouths, from their own vantage point, for the Pharisees believed in rewards and punishments immediatly upon death as so many believe today.
This parable does not say that Jesus believed in immediate rewards and punishments after death; this is what the Pharisees believed. Jesus uses this parable to condemn the Pharisees and to catch them in their own erroneous beliefs.
This passage in Luke must be interpreted in accordance with the great quantity or mass of scriptures.
One cannot reject the one hundred clear passages and accept the one seemingly contradictory one.
Jesus could not have denied Ecclesiastes 9:4,5,6
For to him that is joined to all th eliving there is hope:for aliving dog is better than a dead lion.
For the living know that they shall die: but the dead know not anything, neither have theyanymore a reward: for the memory of them is forgotten.
Also their love, and their hatred, and their envy, is now perished; neither have they any more a portion forever in anything under the sun.
Jesus Christ would not have contradicted the word of God in John 11:11,12,13,14
These things said he: after that he saith unto them, Our friend Lazarus sleepeth, but I go, that I may awake him out of sleep.
Then said his disciples, Lord if he sleep, he shall do well.
Howbeit Jesus spake of his death: but they thought that he had spoken of taking of rest in sleep.
Then said Jesus unto them plainly, Lazarus is dead.
Jesus could not have been more explicit than when He said ...Lazarus is dead....
Luke 14:14
Also plainly teaches about death and ressurection
And thou shalt be blessed; for they (the dead, the lame, the blind) cannot recompence thee: for thou shalt be recompensed at the ressurection of the just.
How could Jesus in one place talk about being recompensed at the essurection of the just and yet teach that there is an immediate reward and punishment after death?
Although Luke 16 must be understood as a parable,
further clarity is achieved with a more accurate translation of verses 22 and 23
And it came to pass, that the beggar died and was carried by the angels into Abrahams bosom: the rich man also died, and was buried; also in hell (hades, the grave)
the first three words of verse 23 "And in hell..." belong as the last words in verse 22. the word "and" must be translated "also" verse 23 begins with the words:
...he (the rich man) lifted up his eyes, being in torments, and seeth Abraham afar off, and Lazarus in his bosom.
Now this is a perfect parable.
The misunderstanding of luke 16 has been read into it by people who try to literalize the parable. Jesus was addressing His illlustration to an indicated group of people and was wisely able to trap them in their own snare of unbelief-"If they hear not Moses and the Prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead." Abraham, Lazarus, and the rich man were not literally alive in "hades" they as all others, are literally dead until the ressurection.
These three people were simply figuratively used to make a striking impact on the criticizing Pharisees