What is your BEST argument against evolution?
Keep in mind that Gravity too is just a theory, but we can sure as heck feel that!
Keep in mind that Gravity too is just a theory, but we can sure as heck feel that!
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
It depends on how you define evolution. My best arguement against evolution is science itself, esp. what they call "evo-devo". Also the arguement of explosions and extinctions is a very good arguement against slow gradual random change over time. The Bible says that God knows the end from the beginning and now science is beginning to show that is true. Life tends to radiate more then it evolves. A lot of the things that Gould predicted were going to be of significance.What is your BEST argument against evolution?
So it has been shown that the old theory is not corrent, just as we said that it was not correct.
Uh, Avatar, I don't think so, you have something confused here.How is it that functionall advantageous genomes exist in a steady line from bacteria to humans with each functional organism being a single point mutation from the next?
It is easy to verify, just google up some information on horse evolution and see how much the thoery has changed in the last 10 years.I'm not sure the example you gave is correct.
In short - It's not like you can claim any credit here.
I'm an adherent of theistic evolution, I do believe evolution occured. But the steady line of increasingly complex organisms just one mutation away from each other is mind-boggling, isn't it? You'd think at some point in the evolutionary line the genetic gap between viable organisms would be too wide to jump, yet that's not the case, why?Uh, Avatar, I don't think so, you have something confused here.
Nobody says this, and those that claim it must be true or evolution is false are making a strawman argument.
ABE: Oh, that's supposed to be your best argument? Are you chanelling SuperSport? Nevermind.
There is no jump, things do not change into something else. God created them from the beginning to be the way they are, even if there is some adjustment and adaption along the way.You'd think at some point in the evolutionary line the genetic gap between viable organisms would be too wide to jump, yet that's not the case, why?
What is your BEST argument against evolution?
Keep in mind that Gravity too is just a theory, but we can sure as heck feel that!
This does not seem to be true for science that is in a constant state of change.
Sorry, I thought you were. Now that I see what you really meant, yes it is amazing. As for genetic gaps too wide to jump, there are lots of them, and so far we haven't found any evidence of them being jumped, or have you found a Pegasus.I'm an adherent of theistic evolution, I do believe evolution occured. But the steady line of increasingly complex organisms just one mutation away from each other is mind-boggling, isn't it? You'd think at some point in the evolutionary line the genetic gap between viable organisms would be too wide to jump, yet that's not the case, why?
God did it. I believe in the Hebrew and Christian Bibles. Therefore, God says it, I believe it...What is your BEST argument against evolution?
What is your BEST argument against evolution?
Keep in mind that Gravity too is just a theory, but we can sure as heck feel that!
Your question assumes that there is some sort of conflict between scientific fact and religious faith.What is your BEST argument against evolution?
Keep in mind that Gravity too is just a theory, but we can sure as heck feel that!
Yeah? And all of that recorded time, eh? Soooo. all those craters up there on the moon caused by massive asteroid impacts, they must have been quite incredible to see. They'd turn earth' night sky to day. And if they all happened in the last 6100 years, why didn't anyone write about them?Evolution required eons of time to operate --- yet the earth has only been in existence for 6100 years.
Evolution required eons of time to operate --- yet the earth has only been in existence for 6100 years.
What is your BEST argument against evolution?
Keep in mind that Gravity too is just a theory, but we can sure as heck feel that!
4 billion 567 million years old. According to latest geological estimates.the earth is around 4 billion years old.