gladiatrix
Card-carrying EAC member
supersport said:Vimes177 said:Is it just me...or does it seem like it's this little ritual of Supersport's to come here every 2 weeks or so, post a long non-sensical post, and then leave, never to comment on that post again, until he comes back 2 weeks later and creates a new thread?
I've got an idea; let's just not comment on his threads anymore. He'll think he won, and he'll leave, and we can have some peace and quiet.
On an unrelated side note, John seems to have gotten better at not posting random made-up statistics. My quote listing lies stagnant...
eh...that's a pretty good observation -- but it's little more often than once every couple weeks...I try to pop in here once a week or so. There's only so much I can handle of this group of evoltuionists. They make me nervous....kind of like when you walk down a dark alley in the middle of the night.
Your OP has been not only thoroughly debunked, but also shown to contain an outright falsehood as exemplified by this sample of posts:
Post #3 by Loudmouth
Post #9 by Logic_Fault
Post #32 by dantose
I especially like the part where posters illustrated how you post completely false information with your little quote-mine:
supersport said:"Evolution is a fairy tale for grown-ups. This theory has helped nothing in the progress of science. It is useless." Professor Louis Bounoure, National Center of Scientific Research.
From TalkORIGINS why the above is yet ANOTHER CREATIONIST LIE (really bears repeating):
The beginning of the quotation, "Evolution is a fairy tale for adults" is not from Bounoure but from Jean Rostand, a much more famous French biologist (he was a member of the Academy of Sciences of the French Academy). The precise quotation is as follows:
"Transformism is a fairy tale for adults." (Age Nouveau, [a French periodical] February 1959, p. 12). But Rostand has also written that "Transformism may be considered as accepted, and no scientist, no philosopher, no longer discusses [questions - ED.] the fact of evolution." (L'Evolution des Especes [i.e., The Evolution of the Species], Hachette, p. 190). Jean Rostand was ... an atheist.
I can see why you can only resort to implying that "this group of evoltutionists" are thugs with this comment:
supersport said:They make me nervous....kind of like when you walk down a dark alley in the middle of the night.
I can see why you resort to this thinly-veiled ad hominem attack, considering you've got nothing in the way of a valid argument against evolution.
Well I guess you have turned out to be figuratively correct in that " this group of evoltutionists" did "mug" (completely demolished) your OP.
Upvote
0