At least 'sleeping' awaiting his next incarnation (may or may not have been some between that death and now).
What Aristotle, none of us are real, this 'world' is just a butterfly's dream.
Still discussing with God just where he and others belong.
Opinions? Hmm... interesting thought. Would you consider opinions to be the same as beliefs? I equate beliefs with faith. But opinions, I'm not sure. The demons know God but they have a pretty bad opinion of him.
hahahaha
you're just being the devil's advocate now.
I don't think there is more than one, no. But other people do. Some people believe in gods and goddesses of different elements of nature. Many OT folks believe in Baal. The Greeks had gods they believed in.
Who did Aristotle believe in? The God of the Bible? Or one of these other gods? I don't know. I don't think anyone can know, except God.
Not his opinion.
Faith is far more than an opinion.
Word.Sometimes I think we read too much into people's writing anyway... This far removed it is hard to tell the motivation. Eh. Philisophical discussions... can't live with them... can't have Discussion & Debate without them..
Word.Sometimes I think we read too much into people's writing anyway... This far removed it is hard to tell the motivation. Eh. Philisophical discussions... can't live with them... can't have Discussion & Debate without them..
If there is only one "Who" out there, but Aristotle had some misconceptions about God's nature, or if someone else calls God by a different name, or someone else describes God in a distorted way, do they all have faith in the same God, although they use different words and concepts to refer to God? If there is only one God, is it possible to have faith in another god?
If one claims to have faith in a nonexistent god, is it really faith, or just an opinion?
If there is only one "Who" out there, but Aristotle had some misconceptions about God's nature, or if someone else calls God by a different name, or someone else describes God in a distorted way, do they all have faith in the same God, although they use different words and concepts to refer to God? If there is only one God, is it possible to have faith in another god?
If one claims to have faith in a nonexistent god, is it really faith, or just an opinion?
Faith is not a synonym of the word opinion, though I respect where you are coming from.I pretty much equate beliefs with opinions, and faith with trust. One of my theology professors said in the Bible, the meaning of the word often depends on the preposition used with the verb. The crucial difference is between "believe that" and "believe in."
However, in theological discussions, I often see doctrinal beliefs equated with faith. I think doctrinal beliefs are just our opinions about the best way to describe something we either don't know for sure or don't have adequate language to describe very well. Theories of atonement or metaphors for salvation are matters of opinion, not faith, to my way of thinking. Yet these are often described as beliefs, and not inaccurately.
I've been accused of that before. But when someone talks about believing in a different god, what does that mean? Looking at the question from one perspective, one might say someone believes in the wrong god, but one could also say someone is calling God by the wrong name or has different ideas about God.
If there is only one "Who" out there, but Aristotle had some misconceptions about God's nature, or if someone else calls God by a different name, or someone else describes God in a distorted way, do they all have faith in the same God, although they use different words and concepts to refer to God? If there is only one God, is it possible to have faith in another god?
If one claims to have faith in a nonexistent god, is it really faith, or just an opinion?
I think faith is far more than opinion, too. But this morning in another thread you seemed to put a lot of stock in opinions. I thought it would be interesting to explore that some more.
What thread are you referring to, because I just went through my "own post" listing and do not see what you are talking about.I pretty much equate beliefs with opinions, and faith with trust. One of my theology professors said in the Bible, the meaning of the word often depends on the preposition used with the verb. The crucial difference is between "believe that" and "believe in."
However, in theological discussions, I often see doctrinal beliefs equated with faith. I think doctrinal beliefs are just our opinions about the best way to describe something we either don't know for sure or don't have adequate language to describe very well. Theories of atonement or metaphors for salvation are matters of opinion, not faith, to my way of thinking. Yet these are often described as beliefs, and not inaccurately.
I've been accused of that before. But when someone talks about believing in a different god, what does that mean? Looking at the question from one perspective, one might say someone believes in the wrong god, but one could also say someone is calling God by the wrong name or has different ideas about God.
If there is only one "Who" out there, but Aristotle had some misconceptions about God's nature, or if someone else calls God by a different name, or someone else describes God in a distorted way, do they all have faith in the same God, although they use different words and concepts to refer to God? If there is only one God, is it possible to have faith in another god?
If one claims to have faith in a nonexistent god, is it really faith, or just an opinion?
I think faith is far more than opinion, too. But this morning in another thread you seemed to put a lot of stock in opinions. I thought it would be interesting to explore that some more.
Are you aware that Liz is Christian and you believe in the same god? You just said that Jehovah (or Yahweh, depending on your translation of choice) doesn't exist.You have have belief and faith in a false god.
What thread are you referring to, because I just went through my "own post" listing and do not see what you are talking about.
Rejection of Christ as the only way is rejection of Christ.
No. If belief in others' eternal damnation bes considered the indispensible core of your faith and the "most personal part of [y]our life" then it does not ONLY doubt your intelligence but pities you supremely. Previously it would have only wanted to be snarky toward ppls like that, but lately it feels more inclined to pray for them because they bes in far worse bondage than it has ever had to know. (Now if it could only exorcise that little twinge of self-righteousness and "nyah nyah" accompanying that otherwise true statement, it might be on track toward where God wants it ... yeah?)So you doubt the intelligence of every Christian simply because you do not share our belief in the most personal part of our lives?
I've heard people say rejecting the N. Creed is rejection of Christ too... It's all doctrine.Well, for one, I thought this was a pretty heavy reliance on opinion:
IOW, if you have the wrong opinion about Christ, one has rejected Christ?
Or did I misunderstand?
I don't think she was defending a thread or that Wiccans and Christians are the same. I think she was pushing those who blindly believe to examine their beliefs. That's all.I am aware that Liz has been defending a thread a thread that supports the false teaching that Wiccans can be Christian and Christians can be Wiccans.
And no, we do not agree. The Christian God very much exists.