yeshuaslavejeff
simple truth, martyr, disciple of Yahshua
That certainly needs clarification.The Holy Spirit is received when one believes.
Remember the ones in the Gospels who believed but didn't receive the holy Spirit ?
Upvote
0
That certainly needs clarification.The Holy Spirit is received when one believes.
Remember the ones in the Gospels who believed but didn't receive the holy Spirit ?
Perhaps. Will address that later if needed/ if God Wills.Is that not before the Holy Spirit was poured out?
What about "the demons believe" ?
Good, yes, thank you. (not just in regards to demons I think; 'mental assent' is not the belief for salvation nor the faith to live by for people either.)There is a difference between belief (mere mental assent in regards to the demons) and trust (the faith of regenerate believers). James in his second chapter, regardless, is speaking of genuine faith producing fruit.
There is a difference between belief (mere mental assent in regards to the demons) and trust (the faith of regenerate believers).
James in his second chapter, regardless, is speaking of genuine faith producing fruit.
How can a person mentally assent to Jesus' teaching without trusting in Jesus? I agree the words believe and trust have different meanings but I don't see how it's possible to believe without trusting. For example, how can someone believe Jesus died for his sins without trusting that Jesus died for his sins?
The way I read it is if you act on your faith then your faith will save you but if you don't act on it then your faith won't save you.
I think you actually answered your own question in the same post >>>How can a person mentally assent to Jesus' teaching without trusting in Jesus?
The way I read it is if you act on your faith then your faith will save you but if you don't act on it then your faith won't save you.
One can believe in God without trusting in him.
That would be an incorrect reading. The issue is genuine faith as opposed to false faith (many times manifested as mere mental assent). Genuine faith leads to good works, while false faith is "alone." Nowhere in James or elsewhere is it argued that faith must be combined with works in order to be effective. It is not the faith that is combined with works that is effective, but the faith that produces works.
How?
What exactly is the difference between genuine faith and false faith? I understand you believe the result is different but how exactly is the faith different?
I think you actually answered your own question in the same post >>>
I'm saying both people mentally assent and trust Jesus but one of them chooses to continue sinning because he loves his sins more than God even though he believes and trusts Jesus' teaching that those who do evil will be condemned.
A person can believe in God, and even believe that he dies for sinners, and yet still not trust in him.
James 2:14-26
One cannot both trust Christ and reject him at the same time. It is a logical impossibility. Either one trusts him, or he does not.
Can you give me an example? If a person believes in God and believes Jesus died for sinners then he trusts that what Jesus said is true.
I studied that chapter multiple times. I see no difference between saving faith and dead faith. They are identical as far as I can tell.
I agree. If a person doesn't trust Jesus then he doesn't believe him either. If a doctor told a patient he had cancer, can he logically respond, "I believe you that I have cancer but I don't trust your diagnosis"?
I think there is an english / other/ language barrier/differences / here.Then the plain language of James has eluded you.
Every false believer that has ever lived.
Then the plain language of James has eluded you.
I think there is an english / other/ language barrier/differences / here.
Simply seeing what's been posted about 'trust' and 'belief' and so on,
there's
some basic differences in english (or other) meanings
that are not fully understood.
I don't mean deeper or whatever meanings - I mean basic simple definitions seem different here for different posters.