juvenissun
... and God saw that it was good.
- Apr 5, 2007
- 25,446
- 803
- 71
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
No, its really not.
Yes, it really is.
Upvote
0
No, its really not.
Explain to me how.
Evidence is not proof. It can not logically "show" the truth. It only points to the truth. You do not really understand what an evidence is.
Hummingbird is an "evidence" of God.
w - i - t - c - h - c - r - a - f - tYou spelled "evolution" wrong.
w - i - t - c - h - c - r - a - f - t
Why is it everytime someone critiques macroevolution, the reply is from a microevolution standpoint.Yes. All those scientific discoveries were made by witches cooking a potion in their cauldron.
I don't believe macroevolution has anything to offer us.KTS said:Besides, if you think so lowly of it, why do you benefit from the knowledge evolutionary theory gives us?
I would get them on an as-needed basis, just as Jesus told me to do.KTS said:Or do you not get antibiotics, flu shots, etc?
Why is it everytime someone critiques macroevolution, the reply is from a microevolution standpoint.
Name one medicine we have in existence today, compliments of macroevolution.
I don't believe macroevolution has anything to offer us.
I would get them on an as-needed basis, just as Jesus told me to do.
No, it isn't.The process of macroevolution is the same as the process of microevolution, just over a different time scale.
Except evolution takes it further.KTS said:Seriously, what you are saying is that walking a kilometer down the street to the shops is a fundamentally different thing to walking into the kitchen.
All that baby-step stuff shows is deep time.KTS said:As I said, the process is the same. Your attempts to pretend that they are two different things is irrelevant.
I seriously doubt it.KTS said:And you'd be wrong
KTS said:What passage is it where Jesus recommends getting your flu shots? Book and verse please.
No, it isn't.
It's much more than that.
Except evolution takes it further.
In evolution, once you get to the shops, you have to agree that the shops are an extension of my kitchen.
Taking baby steps from Boston to L.A. is not the same thing as believing Boston and L.A. are cousins.
All that baby-step stuff shows is deep time.
Nothing more.
I seriously doubt it.
Luke 5:31 And Jesus answering said unto them, They that are whole need not a physician; but they that are sick.
This passage is the beloved physician (Luke) quoting the Great Physician (Jesus Christ).
It's stuff like this that tells me the questioner isn't really trying to understand.Sorry, I must have missed the words talking about flu shots in that. Perhaps you could highlight them for me?
These designs do not require a Designer they are created by a purely natural process based on the random nature of fractal math.A design requires a Designer, creation requires a Creator. Random chance could not have created the world we live in. The math simply does not allow for that. This world could not have created itself.
Whatever design you have it is going to follow the natural laws that were created by God.These designs do not require a Designer they are created by a purely natural process based on the random nature of fractal math.
There are designs like this found every where in nature.
https://www.pinterest.com/pin/173881235588409807/
http://gem-sphalerite.com/inclusions-in-opal/133-dendritic-opal-509
Yet, you'll challenge me to do it, won't you?If you mean that I'm not willing to make the same mental gymnastics that you must do in order to interpret a Bible verse to what you think it means, then no, I'm not.
I wonder how many atheist parents won't let their children, who believe in the Bible, get medical attention (or whatever) unless they first admit "it's not in the Bible" or "the Bible is wrong"?
I'd wager that number is eclipsed by the theist parents who won't let their children received medical treatment on the grounds that something in scripture could be interpreted to be critical of a necessary medical treatment.I wonder how many atheist parents won't let their children, who believe in the Bible, get medical attention (or whatever) unless they first admit "it's not in the Bible" or "the Bible is wrong"?
Either way it's wrong.I'd wager that number is eclipsed by the theist parents who won't let their children received medical treatment on the grounds that something in scripture could be interpreted to be critical of a necessary medical treatment.