This is a very simple thought, but it has had quite a profound effect on me.
Why is it that people always distinguish between seeking God and seeking an experience of God's presence? Why is seeking His supernatural power often put in opposition to seeking to be more like Him? Surely, when we seek to be with someone and to learn from them, we also seek an experience of their presence. When I want to be with a human I love and respect, I am seeking an experience with that individual; in fact, when I say, "I want to meet with x", it means that I both want to get to know that individual better and that I want to be in the presence of that individual. Interaction is an experience; life is experience. Reading words and being profoundly moved by them is an experience. The distinctions Christians put around all these things make no sense to me, because an honest desire to experience God will result in changed behaviour, if a person obeys what he or she has learned, just as an honest desire to understand the Bible will lead to positive change, if a person chooses obedience.
If somebody is just after an experience, and they find that this experience can be found in a Church, then that is a completely separate issue and must not be confused with people who seek to be in God's actual presence, which is the same as seeking God Himself. If somebody is just after "experience" minus God, then they are possibly not interested in Truth anyway. But such people come from all denominations of Christianity; some exchange the emotional high they get with Church atmosphere with the intellectual high they get from understanding very involved theology; the issue with such people is not that they seek the powerful presence of God over God, because both of these are the same, but that they are not seeking God at all.
Why is it that people always distinguish between seeking God and seeking an experience of God's presence? Why is seeking His supernatural power often put in opposition to seeking to be more like Him? Surely, when we seek to be with someone and to learn from them, we also seek an experience of their presence. When I want to be with a human I love and respect, I am seeking an experience with that individual; in fact, when I say, "I want to meet with x", it means that I both want to get to know that individual better and that I want to be in the presence of that individual. Interaction is an experience; life is experience. Reading words and being profoundly moved by them is an experience. The distinctions Christians put around all these things make no sense to me, because an honest desire to experience God will result in changed behaviour, if a person obeys what he or she has learned, just as an honest desire to understand the Bible will lead to positive change, if a person chooses obedience.
If somebody is just after an experience, and they find that this experience can be found in a Church, then that is a completely separate issue and must not be confused with people who seek to be in God's actual presence, which is the same as seeking God Himself. If somebody is just after "experience" minus God, then they are possibly not interested in Truth anyway. But such people come from all denominations of Christianity; some exchange the emotional high they get with Church atmosphere with the intellectual high they get from understanding very involved theology; the issue with such people is not that they seek the powerful presence of God over God, because both of these are the same, but that they are not seeking God at all.
Last edited: