- Jan 13, 2009
- 32,459
- 7,737
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Single
I've seen those and others. Even ten years ago the Flag wasn't as highly scrutinized. Since last July, it's been pariahed.Also...
Upvote
0
I've seen those and others. Even ten years ago the Flag wasn't as highly scrutinized. Since last July, it's been pariahed.Also...
Good for them. I'm not saying they should have been diciplined, just that I can see why there were questions about the jesture.Southern white men have been graduating from West Point for quite some time now. Women, let alone black women, have not.
Ask the people necklaced in South Africa by those giving the Black Power salute.Does the "black power" fist have a comparable history to the confederate flag?
The issue is that they did it in military uniform. That's potentially a violation of DoD regulations. What they do in civilian clothes isn't nearly as scrutinized, though I suspect KKK membership wouldn't be tolerated since they are a terrorist organization.
I've never heard of a regulation against it. The reason political speech is restricted in uniform is to avoid the appearance that the military is endorsing the political speech.This is a side issue which you may know the answer...I know I do not know. Over the years here I know of a few active military people coming here and posting their political views. The question to you is this OK to do under any other name except for their real ones?
Didn't answer the question, you just brought up an unrelated subject using the wrong assumption that all black people are in the same lot.Ask the people necklaced in South Africa by those giving the Black Power salute.
The question was if the Black Power gesture had the same negative connotations that the CSA flag does for some people. The answer is "yes".Didn't answer the question, you just brought up an unrelated subject using the wrong assumption that all black people are in the same lot.
I understand. Then those here who identified as active military and post their political are in violation of regulations. For all I know they are in uniform by the fact they revealed that they are active military.I've never heard of a regulation against it. The reason political speech is restricted in uniform is to avoid the appearance that the military is endorsing the political speech.
No, identifying yourself as a member of the military is not a violation. It's specific to wearing the uniform. Many people go to political rallies and identify themselves as military members.I understand. Then those here who identified as active military and post their political are in violation of regulations. For all I know they are in uniform by the fact they revealed that they are active military.
Who are relevant to Americans because...?Ask the people necklaced in South Africa by those giving the Black Power salute.
http://api.viglink.com/api/click?format=go&jsonp=vglnk_146298199981610&key=da53d7416ed606366eff5a3c28e0b6bb&libId=io31pcf001010mgr000DA8cz610vh&loc=http://www.christianforums.com/members/armoured.338129/&v=1&out=http://sfglobe.com/2015/12/07/white-man-in-the-photo-is-the-third-hero-that-night-in-1968/?src=share_fb_new_47452&sv=3&m=0&btn=bottom&ref=http://www.christianforums.com/conversations/&title=Armoured | Christian Forums&txt=http://sfglobe.com/2015/12/07/white-man-in-the-photo-is-the-third-hero-that-night-in-1968/?src=share_fb_new_47452&sv=3&am...
Some interesting shared history (hat tip @Stanfordella )
Still don't see what it has to do with racial superiority.
I said identifying as active military while stating political views.No, identifying yourself as a member of the military is not a violation. It's specific to wearing the uniform. Many people go to political rallies and identify themselves as military members.
I believe Australia wins more Olympic medals per capita than any other country. Nobel prizes, too, iirc.Very enlightening story; who knew an Aussie ever won anything? Not sure how it's relevant though. Also, the writer is confused about the definition of the word "hero".
You asked a question, I answered. You didn't specify that you only wanted American examples.Who are relevant to Americans because...?
I didn't give anybody any power, just conveying my understanding of the rule. Basically, military members are allowed to express political opinions, they just have to take steps to ensure they are not doing so as a member of the military, but as a citizen.I said identifying as active military while stating political views.
If those women in the picture were not in uniform then we would not know they were active military. There is no indication other than the uniform
If a person here did not state they were active military, we would not know they were active military. There is no indication other than their written words.
You just gave all the power to some clothing while ignoring the true active military status is the person, not the uniform. The point is that we know the person is active military.
For all we know the person sitting at their desk is in uniform.
And how would this be connected to American usage? Given these are not South Africans in the picture, it would seem odd to yoke these girls to another culture and/or country.You asked a question, I answered. You didn't specify that you only wanted American examples.
Besides, it's not some obscure reference, it's one of the most widely recognized uses of the symbol by black guerillas in South Africa during Apartheid.
I answered the question that was posed. It was about negative connotations. More pertinent would be whether it has political connotations, which it may but the DoD has found not to be the case in this instance.And how would this be connected to American usage? Given these are not South Africans in the picture, it would seem odd to yoke these girls to another culture and/or country.
Sure... although I wouldn't say the people fighting against the institution of apartheid have a negative connotation (though not surprised when the Confederate flag is called a symbol of pride, exclusive pride, but pride).I answered the question that was posed. It was about negative connotations. More pertinent would be whether it has political connotations, which it may but the DoD has found not to be the case in this instance.
Raised-Fist Photo by Black Women at West Point Spurs Inquiry
I think it's laughable that people think this is somehow associated with Black Lives Matter. Why? Because they're black?
Seriously, this peeves me to no end. Here we have 16 women graduating from West Point. 16 African American women graduating from one of the top military schools in the nation, and all people can do is complain about this picture. Had they raised their arms fully in victory, someone would've complained that they were doing the Nazi salute.
Instead of looking for ways to be offended by this, people should be exuberant over the fact that there's 16 women graduating from the school, when not too long ago the first female cadet didn't even make it the first year.