Question:

[~WildRoseCowgirl~]

How did the Giraffe evolve?

 

[ChrisS]

How did the Giraffe evolve?

Good question Wild Rose.

Well, it depends on your interpretation of the facts.
The answer evolutionists will give you is that it has a common ancestor, due to transitional fossils. And the answer I'll give you is that God designed it the way he designed those transitional fossils.

It all depends on your interpretation of the evidence though.

 

[Cassandra]

How did the Giraffe evolve?

I have a question for you. Are you interested in the story of long and short neck Giraffes? Or of Giraffes altogether?

 

[Cassandra]

Good question Wild Rose.

Well, it depends on your interpretation of the facts.
The answer evolutionists will give you is that it has a common ancestor, due to transitional fossils. And the answer I'll give you is that God designed it the way he designed those transitional fossils.

It all depends on your interpretation of the evidence though.

EVOLUTION DOES NOT EQUAL ATHEISM!

Just thought I'd point that out for good measure.

 

[~WildRoseCowgirl~]

I have a question for you. Are you interested in the story of long and short neck Giraffes? Or of Giraffes altogether?

I guess giraffes all together.

And ChrisS, I know what I believe is true and there is nothing that can change that, I just want to hear what the Evolutionist's say about Giraffes.

 

[Bargainfluger]

I guess giraffes all together.

And ChrisS, I know what I believe is true and there is nothing that can change that, I just want to hear what the Evolutionist's say about Giraffes.

And you wonder why people get frustrated when they have to deal with this...

Please consider how condescending and insulting you come off as when you make statements like that.

*goes off to take a cold shower*

 

[Cassandra]

I guess giraffes all together.

And ChrisS, I know what I believe is true and there is nothing that can change that, I just want to hear what the Evolutionist's say about Giraffes.

As a matter of interest, what do you believe to be true?

Unfortunately, the site I was planning to use to answer you is down...and it has some good information on Giraffe evolution. So it may take me a little time to come up with an answer. By then, another poster may've done it. Sorry about this...I was prepared to reply.

 

[Ozymandius]

Seriously, why waste your time. If someone already knows what they "beleive is true", using logic and science isn't going to sway their opinion. They're done learning, apparently.

 

[raphael_aa]

I guess giraffes all together.

And ChrisS, I know what I believe is true and there is nothing that can change that, I just want to hear what the Evolutionist's say about Giraffes.

When you say you 'know' something you believe in true, don't you mean you just have a firm conviction? Do you conceed even a slim remote possiblity that your belief about the mechanism God used in creation may be in error? If not, then I just wonder how many other things you 'know' to be absolutely true without the possibility of error? In what matters do you regard yourself as completely infallible? Why isn't such an attitude an example of an unteachable spirit that scripture warns us about?

 

[DGE Project]

It is sipmply impossible for the giraaph to evolve. http://www.evolutionfairytale.com/giraffe1.htm

 

[ImmortalTechnique]

ok dge, if you are going to use creationist sources, at least use ones that know what they are talking about when it comes to the science they are attacking

 

[Ozymandius]

It is sipmply impossible for the giraaph to evolve. http://www.evolutionfairytale.com/giraffe1.htm

You're serious? I don't think this link would convince a retarded toddler that giraffes were "designed".

BTW spellcheck is awesome, try it sometime.

 

[Tomk80]

It is sipmply impossible for the giraaph to evolve. http://www.evolutionfairytale.com/giraffe1.htm

Fred's site shows one of the most basic misconceptions of creationists when it comes to the evolution of the long giraffe neck. Fred obviously thinks that first the neck had to grow very long, and then somehow the artery system had to modify after the neck had grown long. This, obviously, would not be possible. Why Fred can't think of the obvious solution, that the neck and the artery system evolved at the same time is a mystery to me.

 

[mikeynov]

It is sipmply impossible for the giraaph to evolve. http://www.evolutionfairytale.com/giraffe1.htm

In all sincerity, how is it that you're incapable of typing even a single comprehensible sentence?

 

[ImmortalTechnique]

because he isn't concerned with truth, he is concerned with attacking science he does nto understand

 

[DGE Project]

Fred's site shows one of the most basic misconceptions of creationists when it comes to the evolution of the long giraffe neck. Fred obviously thinks that first the neck had to grow very long, and then somehow the artery system had to modify after the neck had grown long. This, obviously, would not be possible. Why Fred can't think of the obvious solution, that the neck and the artery system evolved at the same time is a mystery to me.

Why whould two ingdependt systems that just happend to benifit each oher gradually evoleve orever time? That doen't make any sence.

 

[mikeynov]

Why whould two ingdependt systems that just happend to benifit each oher gradually evoleve orever time? That doen't make any sence.

Probably because you still don't understand evolution.

 

[Douglaangu v2.0]

Well, it depends on your interpretation of the facts.
The answer evolutionists will give you is that it has a common ancestor, due to transitional fossils. And the answer I'll give you is that God designed it the way he designed those transitional fossils.

It all depends on your interpretation of the evidence though.

I see alot of creationists saying this, going on about 'interpretation of the facts'.
The odd thing is they never seem to do any interpreting past ignoring those that disagree with their beliefs.

 

[Bargainfluger]

Why whould two ingdependt systems that just happend to benifit each oher gradually evoleve orever time? That doen't make any sence.

Finally, my incompetence capaciter has been completed. With this translation tool, I might for once be able to figure out what DGE is saying.

Why would two independent systems that just happened to benefit each other gradually evolve over time? That doesn't make any sense.

(corrections noted in red)

Nope, still just as silly as before. Must be that flux radiation transmission...

 

[Illuminatus]

It is sipmply impossible for the giraaph to evolve. http://www.evolutionfairytale.com/giraffe1.htm

That link uses this picture as support that the giraffe couldn't have evolved:

Yes, ladies and gentlemen, the incredible exploding giraffe.