- Sep 4, 2005
- 24,721
- 14,603
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Others
It's a bird. It's a plane. It's a Superman comic under the Constitution for this congressman | CNN Politics
California's Robert Garcia will be sworn into office with the Constitution -- and a priceless vintage Superman comic.
www.cnn.com
California’s Robert Garcia will be sworn into office with the Constitution – and a priceless vintage Superman comic.
The comic is one of several sentimental items that will be underneath the Constitution when Garcia takes his ceremonial oath. The copy of “Superman” #1 will be joined by a photo of Garcia’s parents, who died of Covid-19, and his citizenship certificate, according to a Thursday tweet from Garcia.
“I’m looking forward to being sworn-in on the U.S. Constitution,” the Democrat wrote. “Underneath the Constitution will be 3 items that mean a lot to me personally. A photo of my parents who passed due to covid, my citizenship certificate & a Superman #1 from the @librarycongress.”
I know some people have been pearl-clutching about this, but I see this as a sincere move.
While I may not have the same viewpoint as a religious person (and perhaps there's some "law of nostalgia" this is perceived to be violating?), if a non-religious person is being sworn into office, I'd rather see them place their hand on something that has meaning to them vs. pretending to care about a belief system when they actually don't.
If a person's an atheist, do you want them placing their hand on a bible to just give an insincere nod to your belief system simply to pander? Or would you prefer them to be upfront and honest about how their beliefs differ from your own? Personally speaking, I'd prefer the latter, but I can't speak for religious people.