Albion
Facilitator
No, no. All you are saying there is that we disagree on whether it's works and faith together that bring salvation or if it's faith only. The issue (going back a few posts) was the misunderstanding of what is meant by "works." It is not the case that anything 'that takes work'--i.e. any action whatsoever--is what it meant by that word, regardless of which side of the issue one stands on.No, the issue goes back further than that apparently, perhaps to a misunderstanding on your part of how people are made just in the eyes of God
But perhaps the best way to address this, since you brought it up, would be for you to give an example of someone you know that believes they must strive in some capacity to maintain justice and attain eternal life, working out their salvation together with He who works in them, which includes performing works of love prepared for them beforehand to do -if this fits your definition of "works righteousness". Because, if so, I've known thousands of this persuasion, and they are the least likely to be smugly assured of their salvation.
I'll give you a real example of the real problem. You've probably heard it voiced yourself. A poster says "Baptism is a "work" because you have to submit to having water poured on you...but that action can't save you."
The problem there is not solely faith vs works. It's that the speaker doesn't understand that "works" are good deeds that supposedly earn God's favor for being so Christlike. Or charitable. Or merciful. Or loving. Some people think that all of that earns points towards salvation. This is what is called "works righteousness."
But our friend "thecolorsblend," although a convert to Catholicism, completely misses that when he says something like "So even if you buy into sola fide, you're still doing something. It's an action. A work, one might say."
"Doing something" is not a "work" when it comes to this issue of salvation or faith vs works.
Upvote
0