- Apr 30, 2013
- 30,757
- 18,598
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- United Ch. of Christ
- Politics
- US-Democrat
The Law/Gospel distinction is Luther's greatest achievement, and one that is probably the least appreciated by non-Lutherans. Though I have seen a few Catholics and Orthodox (Fr. Aidan Kimel) use the Law-Gospel distinction.
As Luther goes on in years, he becomes more cantankerous, dogmatic, even fundamentalist. But the early Luther is quite good, still is relatively catholic and there is room for more ecumenical dialogue.
GV, the "priesthood of all believers" wasn't actually something Luther explicitly said. Just like he actually wasn't fond of "sola scriptura". It was something that Lutheran and Reformed scholastics came up with to use in debates against Roman Catholics. But it never meant what modern evangelicals mean by the term- individual autonomy in matters of religion.
Secularism was an outgrowth of religious conflict, then the Jesuits and Protestants resurrected skepticism to use in their "debates" and polemics. Eventually, skepticism took on a life of its own, esp. after philosophers like Hume got hold of it.
As Luther goes on in years, he becomes more cantankerous, dogmatic, even fundamentalist. But the early Luther is quite good, still is relatively catholic and there is room for more ecumenical dialogue.
GV, the "priesthood of all believers" wasn't actually something Luther explicitly said. Just like he actually wasn't fond of "sola scriptura". It was something that Lutheran and Reformed scholastics came up with to use in debates against Roman Catholics. But it never meant what modern evangelicals mean by the term- individual autonomy in matters of religion.
Secularism was an outgrowth of religious conflict, then the Jesuits and Protestants resurrected skepticism to use in their "debates" and polemics. Eventually, skepticism took on a life of its own, esp. after philosophers like Hume got hold of it.
Last edited:
Upvote
0