Nadiine
Well-Known Member
- Apr 14, 2006
- 52,800
- 48,336
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Their promotion is what's different.I don't see how you can accept or refuse to accept someone else's sin... that is between them and God. We don't legislate against a great many sins... why is this one different?
When they seek to redefine the family unit thru legal channels, it
becomes different becuz it directly affects all people;
esp. younger generations who grow up in it.
We DO legislate a great many sins too - why NOT this one!
I ask the same in the opposite way.
It's clear to me you don't view it as so harmful at all.
Plenty of Christian teachers & leaders have spoken out on
how harmful this is and what it means for society.
Kids will also be taught homosexuality in public schools,
that's a whole other issue. They're already pushing to get it
into curriculum for grade schoolers.
By the way, you totally ignored the pedophile's plight.
The fact remains that they cannot indulge in what they
please; nor can the unhappy spouse in the dead end marriage....
The fact that you say it harms noone tells me plenty.But, in the case of homosexual marriage we are talking about two adults who are committed to a continuing relationship to one another. I agree that paedophiles can't help their attraction, but it is nonetheless one which must be legislated against since it harms an innocent party. The same goes for the husband... he made vows to his wife, and breaking those is wrong. Homosexual marriage harms no one...
Instead of spending time typing out the harms, I'll just go find
someone elses points in why it's harmful. Not that it'll matter once
people decide sin is fine.
The fact that God forbids it is proof that it IS harmful; all sin
is harmful.
Upvote
0