Jesus would have told them that they had misunderstood him if he didn't mean for them to literally carry a sword. And notice that even when Jesus tells Peter to put his sword away he doesn't tell him to get rid of it. He only tells him to put it back in its sheath.
Because the sword Peter would've had, was used for cutting wood and other types of work, especially as a fisherman, more than being used as a weapon against human beings. ... SNIP
I don't know how my words here would jibe with church teaching, but I will admit to being a terrible, sinful Christian. Having lost my mother a month ago, I'll just say that not only would I happily disobey the church, I would march into hell if that's what it took to protect her.
Having said that, I doubt anybody on this forum would think you did anything wrong by protecting your mother. And like I suggested before, if God thinks it is wrong, he and I are going to have an argument before he sends me to the down elevator.
By the way, I've never shot anything other than a target and a couple of cans, but I am a trained gun owner as well.
SNIP ... I used Zimmerman as just one example of a paranoid gun owner killing an innocent unarmed teen,
SNIP ... I really can't believe this is a serious conversation.
Just tell us your trying to yank our chain and we can move on.
OK, do you all think that the 72 were sent out brandishing swords?
10 Now after this the Lord appointed [a]seventy others, and sent them in pairs ahead of Him to every city and place where He Himself was going to come. 2 And He was saying to them, The harvest is plentiful, but the laborers are few; therefore beseech the Lord of the harvest to send out laborers into His harvest. 3 Go; behold, I send you out as lambs in the midst of wolves. 4 Carry no money belt, no bag, no shoes; and greet no one on the way. 5 Whatever house you enter, first say, Peace be to this house. 6 If a [c]man of peace is there, your peace will rest on him; but if not, it will return to you. 7 Stay in [d]that house, eating and drinking [e]what they give you; for the laborer is worthy of his wages. Do not keep moving from house to house. 8 Whatever city you enter and they receive you, eat what is set before you; 9 and heal those in it who are sick, and say to them, The kingdom of God has come near to you.
Since you are a Catholic, I would imagine that you believe in the saints which have been officially canonized by the Catholic Church, as well as in the "communion of saints" -- meaning that all saints in Heaven are in communion with the Holy Trinity and each other as part of the Bride of Christ -- His Church. That would necessarily include Saint Joan of Arc -- officially canonized by the Catholic Church in 1920 and venerated in both the Catholic Church and the Anglican Communion.
Now, there are some who contend that St. Joan of Arc never used her sword nor even carried one into battle (but rather that she carried her banner instead). I don't know whether that's a case of revisionist history or the truth; I'll leave that to speculation. But rather than her being a pacifist, what can't be denied is that she led men into armed conflict -- men who were armed with swords or other weapons, and who used them to kill. Yet, ... she is a saint, and therefore a Christian -- attaining a level of perfection in her faith that few, if any, of us still on earth have yet achieved. If she were still here, would the lirberals pass judgment upon her because she were in support of 'a just war' and the use of the sword? How self-righteous some of us are.
'BEARING ARMS' -- St. Joan of Arc
Your brother in Christ,
Bill Velek
This discussion is a separate issue from Just War. Carrying a glock on your hip hoping some punk will give you trouble so you can blow him away is not Just War. Zimmerman was not just war.
Joan of Arc probably was.
How ill informed and judgmental some of us are.
This discussion is a separate issue from Just War. Carrying a glock on your hip hoping some punk will give you trouble so you can blow him away is not Just War. Zimmerman was not just war.
Joan of Arc probably was.
How ill informed and judgmental some of us are.
Just checking in to see if anyone did what I would call 'good news'--if any of you decided to give up your weapons for Lent!
With all those Bible quotes from Jesus I read, it sounds like weapons would be the ideal thing to abstain from using during Lent.
The primary purpose of kitchen knives is preparing food for one's family. I don't own switchblades, scimitars, swords, or other knives that could be classified as weapons.
And that's how kitchen knives differ from guns.
The primary purpose of kitchen knives is preparing food for one's family. I don't own switchblades, scimitars, swords, or other knives that could be classified as weapons.
And that's how kitchen knives differ from guns.
The primary purpose of kitchen knives is preparing food for one's family. I don't own switchblades, scimitars, swords, or other knives that could be classified as weapons.
And that's how kitchen knives differ from guns.
To keep things in perspective, this might help:
Once upon a time, there was maybe, no difference between kitchen knives and weapons. Besides when a fist can kill me, should all fists be confiscated? Should the right to carry your hand openly,,,,be allowed.
And no, that is not a ridicous statement just because everyone carries one, it is ridiculous because lots of things harm and kill, even words. To hamper normals, thinking they are dangerous in masses has never been true, yet it is said they are. As a result normal, which is roughly 80% of the population, is not allowed to help.
LOVE,
...Katie.
The primary purpose of kitchen knives is preparing food for one's family. I don't own switchblades, scimitars, swords, or other knives that could be classified as weapons.
And that's how kitchen knives differ from guns.
Dear,
are you like me with more than 45 years of civilian combat?