Evolutionist doesn't seem to understand there is a huge difference between a light sensitive spot from an eyeball. A moving eyeball would be a huge disadvantage without the muscles to control it and muscles are completely useless without an movable eyeball in an eye socket. To me all evolution ever had was Darwin's "the little eyeball that could " fairy tale. They continue to repeat Darwin's fairy tale to this day.It isn't a fairy tale. Is that all you have, name calling?
The argument that creationists give us is that you need all of the parts in the human eye all at once in order to have function. This isn't true. Even something as simple as a light sensing organelle in a single celled protist can provide a selective advantage.
Upvote
0