There was no lie about homosexuals. In fact, the two times the term homosexual was even used in your quote was as a modifier indicating the type of marriage and the type of lobbying group.I think the website that you showed to Dies is actually a pretty good example.
Take this for example.
"Since homosexual marriage became legal the rates of HIV / AIDS have gone up considerably in Massachusetts. This year public funding to deal with HIV/AIDS has risen by $500,000. As the homosexual lobby group MassEquality wrote to their supporters after successfully persuading the Legislature to spend that money: "With the rate of HIV infections rising dramatically in Massachusetts, it's clear the fight against AIDS is far from over."
Notice anything missing? There's no citation. No details They couldn't even give us the rate of HIV infection. Did it really go up? If so then by how much? No explanation for the correlation.
If HIV rates DID go up, how is homosexual marriage responsible? Correlation doesn't prove causation. The website author just chose to blame gay marriage for it knowing that their moronic supporters would buy it hook line and sinker.
So, this is a pretty good indication of an anti-gay group. A group that blatantly lies about homosexuals in order to make them look bad.
The quote you posted is communicating that they are anti gay marriage, not anti gay person. I see this error being committed very often, so often in fact that I have to wonder if it is an oversite or an intended untruth.
It is possible to be against an action and yet not be against a person partaking in the action.
Upvote
0