That does not answer my question. You seem to be deflecting and avoiding it for some reason.Funny you should ask. If they can do this to Trump once the precedent has been set they can do it to anyone.
Upvote
0
That does not answer my question. You seem to be deflecting and avoiding it for some reason.Funny you should ask. If they can do this to Trump once the precedent has been set they can do it to anyone.
Has he attended the graduation of any of his other children or is this simply him trying to pull a power move?The judge let a witness be out of court to attend a wedding but Trump can’t go to his son’s graduation?
Why?Has he attended the graduation of any of his other children or is this simply him trying to pull a power move?
View attachment 346044
It's just a meme though. Please feel free to research and confirm.
He had the right AND the unobstructed opportunity to do the same for his other children. Doesn't really seem like he's actually that interested in supporting them in that way.Why?
I have no idea if any of that is true but if it is Trump still has a right to attend his son’s graduation if he wants to.
Why would you think that?Could be that he regrets missing the others
Why?
I have no idea if any of that is true but if it is Trump still has a right to attend his son’s graduation if he wants to. Could be that he regrets missing the others
Regarding counsel's request that the Court adjourn on Friday, May 17th for Mr. Trump to attend his son's high school graduation and Friday June 3rd to allow a member of the defense team to attend their son's graduation, I cannot rule on those two requests at this time. It really depends on how we are doing on time and where we are in the trial. If everything is going according to schedule without unnecessary delays, then I am sure we will be able to adjourn for one or both of those days, but if we are running behind schedule, we will not be able to.
Seems to me there is a recording of Trump and Cohen discussing how they could pay Karen McDougal, the other woman paid off with $150,000.Right - he made the deal - executed it - all without Trumps approval or knowledge.
Which case are we talking about?Seems to me there is a recording of Trump and Cohen discussing how they could pay Karen McDougal, the other woman paid off with $150,000.
The one that is currently ongoing and mentioned in the title of the thread.Which case are we talking about?
Yup, sure is. Nothing to do with Karen at all.The one that is currently ongoing and mentioned in the title of the thread.
Yup, sure is. Nothing to do with Karen at all.
If you say so....
Do you think Clinton will be nextDemonstrating a pattern of paying off women who allegedly had affairs with the defendant is a valid line of inquiry IMO.
Do you think Clinton will be next
I meant next to be prosecuted - his payouts for silencing woman dwarf Trumps.Well, since Clinton is not a defendant and has no involvement with the charges against Trump, I would say there is no reason to call him as a witness - for the prosecution nor the defense.
I meant next to be prosecuted - his payouts for silencing woman dwarf Trumps.