Title 42 has expired. Here’s what happens next

[ThatRobGuy]

https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/11/us/title-42-what-happens-next/index.html

Now that Title 42 has lifted, the US government is returning to a decades-old section of US code known as Title 8, which Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas has warned would carry “more severe” consequences for migrants found to be entering the country without a legal basis.

The Department of Homeland Security has repeatedly stressed in recent months that migrants apprehended under Title 8 authority may face a swift deportation process, known as “expedited removal” – and a ban on reentry for at least five years. Those who make subsequent attempts to enter the US could face criminal prosecution, DHS has said.


The administration is also rolling out new, strict policy measures following the lifting of Title 42 that will go into effect this week.

That includes putting into place a new asylum rule that will largely bar migrants who passed through another country from seeking asylum in the US. The rule, proposed earlier this year, will presume migrants are ineligible for asylum in the US if they didn’t first seek refuge in a country they transited through, like Mexico, on the way to the border. Migrants who secure an appointment through the CBP One app will be exempt, according to officials.



The part I bolded is something that is a good policy, and one that I've advocated for in the past and that several other countries have already adopted. For instance, the EU implemented the The Dublin III Regulation, which follows a slight variation of the "first safe country" principle of asylum.

The goal being to make sure that asylum seekers aren't specifically "country shopping" for the one that offers the most economic benefits, as seeking asylum is something very different than emigrating for other reasons (in which it's perfectly fine to find the country you truly think is the best, and apply to move there through the normal channels)

 

[Landon Caeli]

That's all fine and dandy, strict policy and all, but is anyone going to follow the policy? Thousands of people sneak across the border everyday - people who don't follow policy.

 

[Landon Caeli]

I truly see this as an ongoing invasion against the United States. People are coming to take our resources away from us, and we hardly do anything to stop it.

 

[Wings like Eagles]

I also see it as a total invasion, an avoidable humanitarian crisis.
Biden and the current administration are getting just what they want total chaos. Drugs, human trafficking, slavery, misery.

 

[Wings like Eagles]

Terrible that this has been done.

US border crisis: El Paso readies for rise in crossings as end of Title 42 looms

Cities on both sides are predicting a rise in attempted crossings when a pandemic-era policy expires.

www.bbc.com

 

[Wings like Eagles]

Border Patrol union rips ‘corrupt’ Biden administration for worst crisis ‘ever seen at our border’​

MSN

 

[wing2000]

https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/11/us/title-42-what-happens-next/index.html

Now that Title 42 has lifted, the US government is returning to a decades-old section of US code known as Title 8, which Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas has warned would carry “more severe” consequences for migrants found to be entering the country without a legal basis.

The Department of Homeland Security has repeatedly stressed in recent months that migrants apprehended under Title 8 authority may face a swift deportation process, known as “expedited removal” – and a ban on reentry for at least five years. Those who make subsequent attempts to enter the US could face criminal prosecution, DHS has said.


The administration is also rolling out new, strict policy measures following the lifting of Title 42 that will go into effect this week.

That includes putting into place a new asylum rule that will largely bar migrants who passed through another country from seeking asylum in the US. The rule, proposed earlier this year, will presume migrants are ineligible for asylum in the US if they didn’t first seek refuge in a country they transited through, like Mexico, on the way to the border. Migrants who secure an appointment through the CBP One app will be exempt, according to officials.



The part I bolded is something that is a good policy, and one that I've advocated for in the past and that several other countries have already adopted. For instance, the EU implemented the The Dublin III Regulation, which follows a slight variation of the "first safe country" principle of asylum.

The goal being to make sure that asylum seekers aren't specifically "country shopping" for the one that offers the most economic benefits, as seeking asylum is something very different than emigrating for other reasons (in which it's perfectly fine to find the country you truly think is the best, and apply to move there through the normal channels)

+ Sec of State Blinken:

"...one of the new programs that we’re instituting and that you’ll see come to fruition in the weeks ahead are something we’re calling Regional Processing Centers. This gives people an opportunity in their own countries to make a determination about whether they are eligible legally to come to the United States by one of the various lawful pathways that exist; for example, to get a work visa, to be reunited with family, to qualify as a refugee. And making that accessible, making that available to people, gives them an opportunity in their own countries to find out if they can come to the United States lawfully instead, again, of making the incredibly hazardous journey all the way to our border, with all the dangers and all the costs that come with that, only to find out that no, they can’t get in."

Secretary Antony J. Blinken with Amna Nawaz of PBS NewsHour - United States Department of State

QUESTION: Secretary Blinken, welcome to the NewsHour. Thank you for joining us. SECRETARY BLINKEN: Good to be with you. QUESTION: So we are speaking at a time of unprecedented global migration. As you well know, our southern border is no exception. As Title 42 goes into ending tonight...

www.state.gov

IMO, they should have started this program much sooner...

 

[iluvatar5150]

Border Patrol union rips ‘corrupt’ Biden administration for worst crisis ‘ever seen at our border’​

MSN

It'd be great if Republicans would help push for policies that reduce the motivations for people to travel to our borders. Why are we still sanctioning Cuba and Venezuela?

 

[Wings like Eagles]

As Ted says, Biden this is your fault!

MSN

 

[wing2000]

It'd be great if Republicans would help push for policies that reduce the motivations for people to travel to our borders. Why are we still sanctioning Cuba and Venezuela?

It would be great if Republicans would work in a constructive manner with Democrats to implement comprehensive immigration reform instead of using illegal immigration as a political talking point (Ted Cruz for example..).

The mess that we have today at the border is a result of 15+ years of immigration deadlock in the U.S. Congress.

 

[dogs4thewin]

It'd be great if Republicans would help push for policies that reduce the motivations for people to travel to our borders. Why are we still sanctioning Cuba and Venezuela?

by the same token if they know they will be forced out and not welcomed then maybe they would bot want to come. I think it would really help to drop birthright citizenship or at least force parents facing being deported to either put their children in the foster system OR take them with them and when the child comes of age the child may then come back into the country just like any other American who leaves for a time. If the parents knew they would be forced out and the children could not "protect" them they may be less likely to come here. Likewise, if someone knew that any crime would get them deported even crimes that are infraction and not even considered a crime in some areas (think most traffic violations) they may be less likely to come.

 

[Desk trauma]

by the same token if they know they will be forced out and not welcomed then maybe they would bot want to come. I think it would really help to drop birthright citizenship…

Just repeal the 14th amendment, no biggie.

 

[dogs4thewin]

Just repeal the 14th amendment, no biggie.

yes I am aware of that, but as other people love to point out it can be done and also the second part of that may help.

 

[Desk trauma]

yes I am aware of that, but as other people love to point out it can be done and also the second part of that may help.

It’s delusional to think that the 14th amendment could be repealed for immigration reform when we cannot even get an immigration reform bill passed.

 

[dogs4thewin]

It’s delusional to think that the 14th amendment could be repealed for immigration reform when we cannot even get an immigration reform bill passed.

I know, but I am saying that would help not that it would happen in the near furture. The second part of that would help too if parents knew they had to make that kind of choice who would want to make that kind of choice about their children? Either you leave them here or you take them with you and lose what you wanted for them in the first place until their 18th birthday.

 

[USincognito]

Border Patrol union rips ‘corrupt’ Biden administration for worst crisis ‘ever seen at our border’​

MSN

A highly editorialized NY Post attack piece?

As Ted says, Biden this is your fault!

MSN

A demagogue Senator who thinks he's a president in waiting?

 

[High Fidelity]

I truly see this as an ongoing invasion against the United States. People are coming to take our resources away from us, and we hardly do anything to stop it.

History repeats itself, I guess.

 

[High Fidelity]

yes I am aware of that, but as other people love to point out it can be done and also the second part of that may help.

So much for the Constitution...

 

[dogs4thewin]

So much for the Constitution...

Again I did not say it would happen any time soon; although I am not sure why the second part of that would not work.

 

[Wings like Eagles]

A highly editorialized NY Post attack piece?

A demagogue Senator who thinks he's a president in waiting?

No need an attack piece, the evidence is there for all to see. Even the deceivers cannot stop the avalanche of accountability leading right to the front door of the White House.

This is even worse than what Biden did in Afghanistan, almost like these two atrocities were intentional.