Bottom line is, if that man lies after I have a written sworn statement that I saw him hit that golfball through my windshield from next door, my claim and my court is still the highest one.
So to sum up, weve got 4 scenarios:
A. Moxie makes a truthful claim against Bhamster in his private court of record (PCOR). Bhamster concurs with your claim.
B. Dave makes a claim in his PCOR against Bhamster in which Dave
genuinely believes he's being truthful. But in reality, the claim is false because what Dave was
certain he really saw, wasnt quite what
actually happened. Natually, Bhamster diputes Dave's claim.
C. Mendax knowingly makes a false claim in his PCOR against Bhamster. Bhamster of course diputes this claim.
D. Moxie makes a true claim against Mendax in his PCOR. Mendax lies and disputes the claim.
-------------
The outcome of A should be obvious... to the point that a PCOR should not even be necessary as long as Bhamster is a decent moral person. He will simply volunteer proper restitution.
But what happens in the case of B?
And in the case of C?
And D?
Who decides which persons claim is true?