Oh did you refer to 2 Corinthians in your first post? Nope...I went back and checked it out...no quote there. So I was poking fun at your question.
First, you said,
"And I have no problem using levity when it comes to what God said. Paul used it often and was incredibly sarcastic."
God's Word should not be taken lightly. Now, you are acting like that this is not the case.
Second, the question I asked in the Original Post is clearly recognizable to believers that it is based on Scripture and your poking fun at it does not change that fact (Regardless of whether you are aware that the question is based on Scripture or not). In either case, you should know now that the question is now based on 2 Corinthians 13:5 (By which you should show more respect to the question asked).
So you come to a Christian forum that is populated with predominately Christian people on the forum. And you asked your question with the intent to lure them in so you can tell them they are wrong....so you are trying to pick an argument?
The argument is to lead them to the truth whereby they will repent of their wrong thinking. Paul says, "Examine yourselves, whether ye be in the faith; prove your own selves. Know ye not your own selves, how that Jesus Christ is in you, except ye be reprobates?" (2 Corinthians 13:5).
Not that I disagree with your statement...where in 2 Timothy 3:16 does it say we correct others...it doesn't...This verse on it's own does not say we should correct others.
And that's because you have to keep reading so as to get the context.
"Preach the word; be instant in season, out of season; reprove, rebuke, exhort with all longsuffering and doctrine"
(2 Timothy 4:2).
But all you did was toss out your question on a Christian forum. I merely pointed out that your question could lead to boasting.
It is not a lead into boasting because it is based on 2 Corinthians 13:5.
I also explained to you that I do not believe in Works Salvationism and that we are not saved by our own effort alone.
I said we are saved by Relationship-sim and by the Work of God done in our life because He lives within us. But you keep ignoring that, though.
It is like a temptation to stumble for those who may be weaker in faith.
What kind of faith are we talking about here?
A sin and still be saved type faith?
A faith that says you will always be a slave to your sin?
Do you not know that Jesus said to TWO people to: "Go and sin no more."?
Does the command to: "Go and sin no more." Sound like we should keep on sinning?
Are you unaware that Titus 1:16 says,, "They profess that they know God; but in works they deny
him, being abominable, and disobedient, and unto every good work reprobate."?
Hebrews 12:14 says, "Follow ... holiness, without which no man shall see the Lord:"
And as already mentioned your intent was to lure in the weak in faith and club them over the head with a baseball bat of what you want to call "correction".
What is an example of a weak faith? To understand that question we have to know what a healthy type of faith looks like versus a dead kind of faith. Scripture says, a dead faith is any kind of faith that does not have any works according to James (James 2:17). A strong faith is mentioned in the heroes of faith chapter (i.e. Hebrews 11). In that chapter we see faith defined as both a belief and as an action.
No disagreement there. But you ask a vague question that is open to many different answers. Some off the cuff examples I mentioned. But you ask the vague question in hopes to lure in someone that will answer it in just a certain way so that you can basically just say "You are wrong"
Are you a mind reader? My guess is that you are not God because your assumption is wrong. My intention of asking the question was so as to lead people to the truth that is in God's Word in regards to a proper understanding on Soteriology or Salvation. You may see something nefarious in that. But I don't. My question was in line with the truth of 2 Corinthians 13:5 which is to lead men to repentance.
Ambiguous statement I made?...that is the whole point..your intitial question was very ambiguous...it is the entire reason for this discussion between you and I.
I am also not seeing how you think what I said was ambiguous....you started it off with "The evidence that one has that God is living within them is if one is actually living righteously" (post #12). That is why I asked you what you meant by "living righteously" who defines that....you asked originally for evidence that you know God....and your answer is "living righteously" How is that evidence for me or for anyone else? What are you going to say is "living righteously", and how does it manifest into evidence?
So you don't think the fruit of the Spirit in a believer's life is not evidence that they know God and they are saved?
That is what I mean by them living righteously. Living righteously is allowing the righteous acts of God to flow thru your life. This is actual righteous acts or deeds that people will be able to see in your life. That is what living righteously means.
Again, read 1 John 3:7.
See you have a problem in your question because ultimately the evidence is that which is seen, and that which is seen is works. So you are asking what works have you done that shows you know God. Which is why your overly ambiguous trap question is bogus to start with.
And what verse in Scripture shows that this statement is true?
And see now you are changing up the question, because a fellowship with God is different than knowing God. Satan knows God but has no real fellowship with Him.
Now you are splitting hairs. When the Bible says that a believer knows God like in 1 John 2:3-4, it is talking about fellowship and not in some casual awareness like being aware of someone's existence.
But to answer your rabbit hole question...The Bible teaches that a person who is saved can never be out of fellowship with God.
Interesting. This is a new one for me. Most Eternal Security proponents I have encountered over the years say that a believer can be out of fellowship with God and still be saved (of which we know is a violation of Scripture that they ignore). Okay, let me ask you a new question now. Do you believe a saint can die in unrepentant sin and still be saved like murder, hate, adultery, theft, and drunkeness, etc.?
Aspects of this are absolutely true... Salvation is by Faith and divine grace alone. A saved person is not "bound" to follow the Law of Moses for salvation, but instead is obedient to the Law of Moses because of salvation.
Nowhere did I mention how we are to obey the Law of Moses. The Old Law was fulfilled by Jesus Christ upon the cross when He died. It's why the Temple veil was torn from top to bottom. But that does not mean there is no more Law of any kind under the New Covenant or New Testament, though. Scriptures says the Law has changed (Hebrews 7:12). Meaning, God Laws are still in existence; And the believer today is supposed to obey the Laws under the New Testament and not the Old Testament. For even the moral laws in the Old Covenant had death penalties attached to them (Which is not the case for the moral laws in the New Covenant).
There are 15 million threads already on this forum debating eternal security vs conditional security. There is no need to start another discussion on the same thing.
Did you ever think as to the reason why many of us here are discussing this topic?
Did you ever think we are creating so many threads on this topic because we care about the souls of men and we want them to see the truth?
IF that was your intent with the thread then consider the conversation done.
I thought the question is fairly obvious that it is a refutation of Eternal Security. If you are just getting it now, then by all means, you are free to leave if you are not up for the debate.
Let it be stated here as well though that people that believe in eternal security for the most part do not believe they have a license to sin.
The only way an Eternal Security Proponent does not believe they have a license to sin is if:
(a) They must live righteously in order to be a true born again Christian.
(b) They believe they can overcome sin in this life.
But most Eternal Security Proponents do not believe that, though. They say they will always sin at some point in the future - which means they are agreeing with sin (Which is a license to sin).
That is a false statement based on no facts just wishful thinking by the opponents of the doctrine....the old political addage of can't win on the facts then start obfuscating and throwing mud works.
I can provided lots of Scripture that refutes Eternal Security. It's all over the Bible on almost every page. There are hundreds of verses.
No disagreement here. There are many wolves in sheeps clothing out there...the TV is filled with them. Faith healers, snake handlers, and that guy with the perfect teeth
And how are they different than those who say they will always be a slave to their sin?
Is that still not a sin and still be saved gospel like the above mentioned false gospels?
For it does not matter if you say that you will sin less and less as a believer the rest of your life.
Just admitting that you will do one sin in the future is essentially saying that one is condoning sin (Of which God cannot agree with).
For if a murderer says he will murder at some point in the future only once, does that mean he is no longer a murderer?
For God calls us to be holy as He is holy. Can a person be holy and still be in sin or agree with sinning in the future?
All of them preaching a different gospel just as Christ warned us would happen. Thankfully God has preserved His word so that we can hold things up to the truth of the Scripture to see if what is spoken is true.
Praise God that we do have Scripture to see those who preach a false gospel and a false Christ indeed. But please be aware that there will be many who will be surprised that they thought they were on Christ's side but Jesus told them to depart from Him because they worked iniquity.
Iniquity is sin.
And Jesus said not everyone who says unto me Lord, Lord, will enter the Kingdom of Heaven but he that does the will of the Father.
(Matthew 7:21).
What is the will of the Father or what is the will of God?
"For this is the will of God, even your sanctification"
(1 Thessalonians 4:3).
(King James).
"God's will is for you to be holy."
(1 Thessalonians 4:3).
(New Living Translation).
For it is written,
"Be ye holy; for I am holy." (1 Peter 1:16).
"Follow ... holiness, without which no man shall see the Lord:" (Hebrews 12:14).
....