justlookinla
Regular Member
Then what is the relationship between humans, pines, and this single life form if it isn't common ancestry. How are you saying that they are related if it isn't by common ancestry.
The question isn't about common ancestry.
You only want to talk about pine trees and humans, so we can only talk about the life forms immediate adjacent to humans and pine trees.
No, we start and the alleged beginning and find the how, the process as evidenced by the scientific method. So for, that hasn't been done.
You said that humans and pine trees emerged from a single life form. Ancestral apes produced humans. You do the math.
Certain forms of evolution says that humans and pine trees emerged from a single life form. We have yet to determine what process, HOW, the process produced pine trees and humans from this alleged single life form of long ago.
Once again, you said this is not about common ancestry. You need to make up your mind.
It's not, it's about the HOW, the process. The alleged common life form is simply the starting point for the HOW, the process of producing pine trees and humans.
Since you only allow us to discuss pine trees and humans, the starting points would be pine trees and humans. That process goes back to their immediate non-human and non-pine ancestors, and stops there since you refuse to discuss common ancestry.
It begins at some point in the distant past with an alleged single life form.
Upvote
0