No. The article in the original post of this thread, which is your thread, is about the desire for the membership policy to change for leaders. There is no sex or gender requirement to be a leader in the Boy Scouts. Therefore, the entire LGBT+ community would be eligible if the policy changed.
I'm quite aware it's my article thank you. It's also not news that letting gay leaders serve is an issue in that piece. Which has been discussed already.
And no, it does not mean the entire LGBT+ (What is the plus standing for?) would be eligible if the policy changed. It's not a matter of if, if you would have read the article. The policy was voted to change so as to allow openly gay boys to join the Scouts.
You're arguing now that the tolerance policy for minor boys is not enough.
Even if we were only talking about boys, the discussion would include bisexual boys, boys who have some degree of attraction to members of the same sex but don't identify as either of those things, allies who are worried that people will label them as gay and take the word of other people over their word, and boys who are interested in dating an intersex or trans person, same legal sex or not, but aren't sure how the Boy Scouts will interpret that.
We are only talking about openly gay boys.
What sponsors the intolerance for the Boy Scouts and religious moral values are arguments like yours.
Boy Scouts of America should engage in a social experiment. Print applications for entry into the Boy Scouts and right after the name and address of the applicant ask that applicant to state their gender, their biological gender, their sexual preference for lovers, and ask if they cross-dress.
Right about the time the ink is just beginning to dry bet donuts a hate group like GLAAD would be all over it! Outrage! "PHOBES!" accusations, Law suits. The ACLU would be interviewed and asked to opine about the new application!
HOW DARE THEY!
Would be the outcry from the gay activists groups.
Meanwhile, folks like you argue now that openly gay boys being permitted in isn't enough. Tolerance for that isn't enough!
Can't wait for the boycotts, the petitions, the outrage as gay activists seek to prove they have no tolerance for religion, in the event someone decides to pursue an agenda against the Scouts the likes of what you describe. And all the while screaming battle cry demanding tolerance!
Or else!
The irony there is a mile wide and a foot thick!