SmellsLikeCurlyFries said:
I can understand that a little better. We tend to fear that which we don't understand.
If you're suggesting that if Westerners understood Islam they would see that there was nothing to fear, that's wishful thinking.
SmellsLikeCurlyFries said:
Of course, aren't they free to live their lives as they wish?
No, Shariah does not permit that. Are we free to live our lives as we wish? The US Constitution says yes. Islam says no.
SmellsLikeCurlyFries said:
And proceeded to fill every country they conquered chock full of schools, libraries, and the most comprehensive system of social welfare on the planet.
So did the Communists. As under Communism, these were systems of social control. This is why the Great Library of Alexandria, which was full of non-Islam books, was burned by the Muslims.
Wayte said:
Eh. Some people can't think through their fear to decipher the difference between the radicals and the sane members of the Muslim community.
Well then, O Enligtened One, perhaps you explain the difference? The terms "radical Muslim" and "moderate Muslim" are frequently used in the Western media, but seldom by Muslims themselves. There are, of course, numerous schools of Islamic thought, but "radical" and "moderate" are not among them.
To the extent that I can discern a difference at all, the distinction seems to be a military one: hostile Muslims are called "radical" and friendly or neutral Muslims are called "moderate". As I pointed out in post #25, though, just because they're not violent doesn't mean they're friendly or neutral.