Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Zimmerman's bond revoked
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="WilliamB" data-source="post: 60652004" data-attributes="member: 282737"><p>It's already been labeled as an "avoidable" shooting. That in its self is a slam dunk manslaughter conviction, which the jury can go with instead of murder 2. </p><p></p><p>If the prosecution can prove that zman's life was not in danger as he claims, that's murder 2. The prosecution is already suggesting that the evidence does not match zman's claims, that he was having his head bashed into the concrete at the time of the shooting. If they can prove this is false, which two eye witnesses at least already say it is, he's in a lot of trouble. Add the on scene evidence and the timeline, that definatley does not fit zman's story and you have murder 2. </p><p></p><p>This latest lie to the court goes to the heart of zman's credibility. If he's going to convince any juror this was self-defense, he has to be credible. From what I see, he so far has a reputation for lying and for disregarding orders to do what he wants to do. He was told on two seperate occasions not to carry a firearm or pursue anyone as neighborhood watch. Once by law enforcement, once by the HOA and again in the clearly stated NW policies. He then disregarded an order from dispatch to not pursue Trayvon. </p><p></p><p>He says he did stop persuing and was returning to his vehicle but that don't match the time line. So either way, he's stuck between a rock and a hard place.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="WilliamB, post: 60652004, member: 282737"] It's already been labeled as an "avoidable" shooting. That in its self is a slam dunk manslaughter conviction, which the jury can go with instead of murder 2. If the prosecution can prove that zman's life was not in danger as he claims, that's murder 2. The prosecution is already suggesting that the evidence does not match zman's claims, that he was having his head bashed into the concrete at the time of the shooting. If they can prove this is false, which two eye witnesses at least already say it is, he's in a lot of trouble. Add the on scene evidence and the timeline, that definatley does not fit zman's story and you have murder 2. This latest lie to the court goes to the heart of zman's credibility. If he's going to convince any juror this was self-defense, he has to be credible. From what I see, he so far has a reputation for lying and for disregarding orders to do what he wants to do. He was told on two seperate occasions not to carry a firearm or pursue anyone as neighborhood watch. Once by law enforcement, once by the HOA and again in the clearly stated NW policies. He then disregarded an order from dispatch to not pursue Trayvon. He says he did stop persuing and was returning to his vehicle but that don't match the time line. So either way, he's stuck between a rock and a hard place. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Zimmerman's bond revoked
Top
Bottom