Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Neither of those statement make the least bit of sense to me as answers to my post. What revolving door?Maybe... but as a human being, isn't a reason implied if nothing else?
But, when would you step out of a revolving door?
Well, I'll try again. You said 'a reason' wasn't a science question. I said, maybe not, but never-the-less there seems to be an implication, from just a human standpoint, that a reason for our existence exists, whether its a science question, or not.Neither of those statement make the least bit of sense to me as answers to my post. What revolving door?
What would be the point... if not?
But, isn't this succumbing to ignorance... why doesn't the ignorance suggest there is more? It does in every other aspect of science.
My 'revolving door' statement is just saying, how long will it take science to realize that they will not find the answer to exactly how or why we began, no matter how long they try, and accept God's sovereign role as the most likely answer?
Yes, it is not a science question and yes, many people, including me, believe in God as that reason, but it's not something science can ever decide for us.Well, I'll try again. You said 'a reason' wasn't a science question. I said, maybe not, but never-the-less there seems to be an implication, from just a human standpoint, that a reason for our existence exists, whether its a science question, or not.
How? Maybe. Why? Never.My 'revolving door' statement is just saying, how long will it take science to realize that they will not find the answer to exactly how or why we began, no matter how long they try...
Many do, for the "why" but they still don't stop looking for the "how."...and accept God's sovereign role as the most likely answer?
What do you think the answer is?I think I know the answer to that... I just can't understand why?
Oh, they do... the question was to non-believers who rely on science and logic only.I would hope that those who believe in a creator god have better reasons that simply not being able to imagine an alternative.
No, it really isn't.Here. Genesis 1:21 AND https://www.smithsonianmag.com › smart-news › behold-luca-last-universa...Jul 26, 2016 -
It's proof of God.
They'll stay in the revolving door.What do you think the answer is?
But, not faith.The answer is simple: we're comfortable with uncertainty.
No, not at all. Much can be learned, even from searching for the unknowable, provided you let yourself see (hence my original question).Do you think accepting God as the "why" means we should stop looking for the "how?"
But, not faith.
I'm still not sure what your actual point is, but you seem to be implying that science is ignoring or trying to avoid the "discovery" of God as creator.No, not at all. Much can be learned, even from searching for the unknowable, provided you let yourself see (hence my original question).
Aman, please explain why verse 24 says cattle should be "his kind" and verse 25 says cattle are "their kind". It's a very simple question which you are avoiding. I want to know why cattle are "their kind" when God said they should be "his kind". Stop dancing and give a straightforward answer.
Genesis 1:1. In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
It doesn't say the Trinity created the heaven and the Earth, it says God. Your attempt to claim that this refers to the trinity is totally without support.
Repeating your claims does not make them fact.
People 3000 years ago could easily have seen that water is required for life.
Already have done. Just because you can't recognise it doesn't mean it was never produced.
Just for you. That's what is interesting. have never met or heard of any other creationist who believes the things you do.
No, that is only true for those who subscribe to the Doctrine of Perspicuity, a distinctly Protestant doctrine and a recent invention at that.Read it for yourself. It's written so that a fourth grader can understand.
But what I meant is, is that what you are preaching here seems unique to you alone.
Whether science can discover God is certainly not my point. My point is that in-light-of there are no scientific answers (stay in that revolving door all you want) as to ‘the reason, the why, or the how’ we came about, why shouldn’t Creation be a considered possibility by non-believers. They are willing to hypothesize everything else.I'm still not sure what your actual point is, but you seem to be implying that science is ignoring or trying to avoid the "discovery" of God as creator.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?