Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Of course no man could have known that. That's why he wrote that a lot of it came from the ground instead, like cattle, and creeping things and Humans themselves.
Actually, it would be more accurate to say that you have come up with an interpretation of Scripture that matches what science has shown us, just so you can say that scripture said it first, even though there is scant evidence to support your claim that your interpretation is the intended one.
And, of course, you are basing your interpretation on, "Well, this is what science says, so I have to find an interpretation that agrees with science." Once again, religion bending over backwards to accommodate science, because as well all know, when science and religion disagree, it's always science that wins because science produces results.
I missed where this was shown to BE a fact.
First evidence of farming in Mideast 23,000 years ago: Evidence of earliest small-scale agricultural cultivation
Oops, looks like science doesn't agree with you again.
The article does NOT say that the sons of God (prehistoric people) farmed but that they were fishermen and they found "weeds" around their camp.
I do know that you have to reject these scientific findings because they don't line up with your beliefs. It just reinforces that your beliefs and science don't line up the way you keep claiming they do.
My interest is in learning the Truth and not lining up my view with the current view since I know it's wrong because it does NOT agree with God's Truth.
There is a pattern, a pattern of you making generalized statements. Its not my homework, its yours. You made a heap of statements which you were not prepared to defend or possibly, didnt know how to.
I have noticed an elitist attitude by some who oppose creationism. My favorite is when our iq and grasp of reality is mocked.
Well dont be shy, what am i to defend or argue?
Let me put it in words a primary school child can understand:No, because I can clearly see that God created first from water on the 5th Day. Genesis 1:21 I can also see that LORD God formed temporary creatures, which were subject to death, from the ground, on the present 6th Day. Genesis 2:19
As you can see, there are two creations, the Eternal one by God the Trinity and the temporary creations formed by LORD God, or the Son of God, called YHWH in the Old and Jesus Christ in the New Testament. Jesus also made Adam/mankind who MUST be born again Spiritually by God the Trinity in order to see the Kingdom of God. Genesis 1:26 Genesis 5:1-2 and John 14:16
Unless you know both God the Father and God the Son, you will remain in darkness. I see the temporary formations of creatures by Jesus as the common ancestors which is what Science calls them. Amen?
You speak of science like it is your faith. Your faith is in men who reason with facts, dont think its anything more special than that.
Sorry, but that is false. God the invisible Spirit, The Trinity, does not create from the creation elements made in the beginning, air, dust and water. This is because these things are APART from God and contaminated with death. Genesis 1:2 Anything made from these creation elements will die, or suffer entropy.
God the Trinity created every living (Eternal) creature that moveth. God the Son/Jesus makes or forms TEMPORARY creatures from the contaminated Earth, like mankind, who is subject to darkness or death. In the end, there will be NO temporary creatures because everything living will be with God forever in Christ.
Can you give us an example? Of course not. If you could, you would have done it long ago. Try to get Genesis to agree with every other discovered Truth and you might learn something. Don't look now, but the traditional understanding of Genesis is changing because Jesus is coming Today, on the present 6th Day/Age in the creation of the perfect Heaven. ALL Humans live and die Today. Heb 9:27
Here. Genesis 1:21 AND https://www.smithsonianmag.com › smart-news › behold-luca-last-universa...Jul 26, 2016 -
It's proof of God.
God doesn't create from air, dust or water BUT he created everything that moves from water and creepy things from earth (dust). And I'd guess the birds were from air?Sorry, but that is false. God the invisible Spirit, The Trinity, does not create from the creation elements made in the beginning, air, dust and water. This is because these things are APART from God and contaminated with death. Genesis 1:2 Anything made from these creation elements will die, or suffer entropy.
God the Trinity created every living (Eternal) creature that moveth. God the Son/Jesus makes or forms TEMPORARY creatures from the contaminated Earth, like mankind, who is subject to darkness or death. In the end, there will be NO temporary creatures because everything living will be with God forever in Christ.
Then you might want to stop claiming, "Scripture, science, history, genetics and math support my view." when there is clearly a huge asterisk* attached to the statement.
*(Namely that you've cherry-picked what you deem to be "truth" in the instance of science, history, etc, etc.)
They do support my view and NO one can refute that fact.
Then someone as knowledgeable as you should refute me, but all i see is criticism.
Let me put it in words a primary school child can understand:
1. Science says ALL life originated in water
Once again you ignore the parts of the Bible that talk about creatures being formed from the ground instead of the water, and make up stories to explain away the discrepancy.
And again you ignore the fact that scientists had figured out that life probably arose in the water LONG before 2016.
Why do you keep presenting these arguments when you have been shown why they are wrong?
God doesn't create from air, dust or water
And I'd guess the birds were from air?
You contradict yourself so often you probably have no idea what position you're arguing at any given point, do you?
You've been refuted eight ways from Sunday. You're just in complete denial at this point.
All I see is denial.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?