Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
When the poster mentioned that he hasn't seen inspiration, or gifts, I gave a link so all could have a boo at both.
I see inspiration and gifts from God there.I didn't boo at them, I enjoyed a snippet from a music concert. I didn't see any special gifts though. We're still waiting for those.
I see inspiration and gifts from God there.
Well yeah, but that is the proper name of the event. (Which did happen.)In the beginning nothing went bang. DUH.
In the one I posted I saw gifts and inspiration. In the one you posted I suspect I would also see inspiration from spiritual sources.You saw a music concert, just like the one I posted.
In the one I posted I saw gifts and inspiration. In the one you posted I suspect I would also see inspiration from spiritual sources.
OK. I'll try to go back and dig it out...try to watch a few seconds if I can stomach it.Why not watch it and find out?
So nothing went bang? Got it.Well yeah, but that is the proper name of the event. (Which did happen.)
Mathemagic:We know through the power of MATH.
Ironic how creationists named the big bang and now they want to discredit it by its name. Make up your mind.So nothing went bang? Got it.
Well yeah, but that is the proper name of the event. (Which did happen.)
Actually, no.Ironic how creationists named the big bang and now they want to discredit it by its name. Make up your mind.
I for one don't care who named the spaghetti monster or the BB creation story.Actually, no.
The name Big Bang was coined by a mocking Fred Hoyle. But Hoyle wasn't a creationist. He was an atheist who opposed the BBT because he saw it as a sneaky way christians could force creationism back in science. Don't forget the BBT was first formulated by a George Lemaître, who was a Catholic priest from Belgium. Pope Pius XII publicly endorsed the BBT.
Hoyle advanced the Steady State Theory, claiming that the niverse had always existed and that there was thus no "Creation Moment", or no "Origin of the Universe". He did this partially to oppose christianity.
You are right that it is funny that creationists forget or ignore this part of the story. That sites like Conservapedia now scream things like ATHEIST BIG BANG etc.
But the BBT wasn't named by creationists. No.
OK I looked at most of it. Words that come to mind are ..hopeless, sad, drugs, meaningless, no real beat, musically uninteresting, pride, droning on......Why not watch it and find out?
The BBT is a mathematical model that was rejected by Fred Hoyle, a mathematician. If a mathematical model is rejected by a mathematician then it should be no big deal if a creationist rejects this same model. The mathematicians don't even agree on the mathematical model, so why should creationists agree?Hoyle advanced the Steady State Theory, claiming that the niverse had always existed and that there was thus no "Creation Moment", or no "Origin of the Universe". He did this partially to oppose christianity.
You are right that it is funny that creationists forget or ignore this part of the story.
The BBT is a mathematical model that was rejected by Fred Hoyle, a mathematician. If a mathematical model is rejected by a mathematician then it should be no big deal if a creationist rejects this same model. The mathematicians don't even agree on the mathematical model, so why should creationists agree?
The BBT is a mathematical model that was rejected by Fred Hoyle, a mathematician. If a mathematical model is rejected by a mathematician then it should be no big deal if a creationist rejects this same model. The mathematicians don't even agree on the mathematical model, so why should creationists agree?
Even worse is when the 'testing' is all based on preconceived present state past beliefs.Hoyle was an astromomer, not a mathematician.
Hoyle rejected the BBT because it conflicted with his philosofical preconceived notions. As such his atitude is exactly the same as the creationists. What he did was bad science.
What you can learn from this is that it is always very dangerous when preconceived notions - like religious domgas - take priority over empirical testing.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?