Being inspired by the Holy Spirit is not the same as the Holy Spirit itself. I am aware of the relationship between the Holy Spirit, God and Christ. However, just because a human is inspired by the Holy Spirit does not automatically make everything s/he says and does right. That is a fact, not opinion.
True, except when certain things he has written are chosen by God to be a written revelation from Him. Then those things are protected from error by His Spirit.
yi: Moses was in direct communication with God (a foreshadowing to the gift of the Holy Spirit), and he still did things during his ministry that were not things the Holy Spirit would do (or command.) One specific thing kept him from entering the promised land.
Yes, and the only way we know Moses did those things is because God commanded him to write them down and God protected them from error when recording those events so we know what happened and is confirmed by the HS to be words from God.
yi: Jonah was directed by God to prophesy to Nineveh, and despite being a prophet he chose to fight the will of God until he was forced to submit.
True, but we would not know this except that God inspired and chose the writer of the book of Jonah to record it inerrantly for inclusion
yi: Peter denied Christ three time, and He was in the presence of the Word of God Itself.
True, but we would not have known this if God had not chosen Mark to infallibly write the memoirs of Peter to be included in His written communication to mankind.
yi: God is no joke; He demands perfection even in humans. We have an Advocate - who is [the Word of] God Himself - to, on our behalf, say, "C'mon Dad give em a pass... I went through it and [x-righteous thing here] is harder for humans than it is for "Us" (Elohim.)" But, that Advocate doesn't mean we get free-rein to break whatever law we have chosen as a culture that is not applicable to our lives. That is supremely dangerous for one's spirit, don't you think?
Yes, that is right but the ceremonial laws, ie sacrificial and dietary laws and etc have been made obsolete when Christ fulfilled them.
yi: The canon is - at best - a compilation of texts concerning the Most High God and his basic requirements. It is in no way the absolute end-all-be-all perfect collection of texts. The amount of politics that went into making the canon alone disqualifies the canon as a pure piece of inspirational work by men concerning God. Men put their will into the addition and removal of books, words and resources.
Evidence for this? There is no evidence that politics had anything to do with the formation of the canon. The laity of the church had been using the canon hundreds of years before it was made official by the holy spirit guided leaders of church.
yi: Yet, and still, The Most High God never told any of us - in the canon or apocrypha - that He would allow us to pick and choose what law to follow, that He Himself said any of His law is no longer applicable, or that His law is conditional based on genetics or respect. Never.
No, the fulfillment of the ceremonial law were commanded by God and Christ as I have shown above.
yi: In fact, the Apocryphal books (beyond Enoch) constantly talk about the Christ, and His advent that birthed Christianity. Not one of the books ever hints that the Most High God allows us to follow some of His laws based on conditions. The Ancient of Days (Christ) never says this. When He came to the planet and ministered He said that the law would never be changed until heaven and earth pass (which is also never; earth puts on new garments, it doesn't go away.)
I have to disqualify any human that contradicts God, because His spirit poured on someone won't contradict Him. I don't care how much inspiration they claim to have: if they contradict God then they are liars. It is very simple.
The writers of the Bible did not claim the inspiration themselves, it was revealed that they were inspired by the Holy Spirit Himself directly to the Church.
yi: Any entity saying that God says we don't have to follow all of His laws as an obedient child of God who loves Him is erroneous - when Christ and God throughout the canon say that if you love God, you will keep His commandments. That means all of them. If you can show where Christ said that we only have to follow some laws for some condition, then I am all ears. But, just know that the "...in these two are contained the entire law of God" is because 1) if you love God, you will do what He says (Commandment 1-4, anything that begins with a command) and 2) if you love your neighbor like you love yourself, then you won't steal from them, enslave them more than 7 years without debt forgiveness, they won't rape someone, etc.
I want to know where God/Christ say explicitly that we can conditionally follow any of His laws? IF you cannot tell me other than implications from prophets, then with respect I reject those completely. I would like to see it from the Horses' Mouth.
The Prophets that were chosen by God to write down His one and only written revelation WERE the very Mouth of GOD for that period that they wrote the canonical books. And you have no evidence to believe otherwise.