Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Young Earth Creationist gathering!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RufusAtticus" data-source="post: 573416" data-attributes="member: 2592"><p>In no instance can you use something to prove itself, because all you have proved is that you have no proof all.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Except that they disagrees with Genesis 2:18-22.</p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p>Umm. The documentary hypothesis is not a controversial claim. It is the concensus of modern biblical scholarship.</p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Read AiG's statement again. They dismiss the Documentary Hypothesis with the following.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>In other words, "the DH must be false or we'd be wrong." Sounds like pride to me. The 1-4 that you referenced is their argument that Moses had to be the writter, after they'd established, in their mind, that that there was only one.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>If that is true then you're not a biblical literalist, since the literal Biblical Hebrew clearly indicates multiple authorship. </p><p></p><p>For some Christian views about resolving New Testament claims of "Mosaic" authoriship, with the knowledge that multiple authors contributed to the Pentateuch please read <a href="http://www.christianforums.com/threads/25877-1.html" target="_blank">this</a> thread.</p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p>I don't see an "up to this point" in the text, or anything similar. What textual evidence in Genesis 2 leads you to this conclusion?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RufusAtticus, post: 573416, member: 2592"] In no instance can you use something to prove itself, because all you have proved is that you have no proof all. Except that they disagrees with Genesis 2:18-22. Umm. The documentary hypothesis is not a controversial claim. It is the concensus of modern biblical scholarship. Read AiG's statement again. They dismiss the Documentary Hypothesis with the following. In other words, "the DH must be false or we'd be wrong." Sounds like pride to me. The 1-4 that you referenced is their argument that Moses had to be the writter, after they'd established, in their mind, that that there was only one. If that is true then you're not a biblical literalist, since the literal Biblical Hebrew clearly indicates multiple authorship. For some Christian views about resolving New Testament claims of "Mosaic" authoriship, with the knowledge that multiple authors contributed to the Pentateuch please read [url=http://www.christianforums.com/threads/25877-1.html]this[/url] thread. I don't see an "up to this point" in the text, or anything similar. What textual evidence in Genesis 2 leads you to this conclusion? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Young Earth Creationist gathering!
Top
Bottom