I have issues with people or doctrines that come by way of revelation and don't have scriptural support, or add like twenty paragraphs of deductions as to why what they are spouting should be believed. In spite of that, sometimes, someone else will pop up with the same story only with a plausible or at least reasonable explanation why the believe the same thing using scripture. Sort of kicks me in the pants. Anyway I think it is dangerous to teach something by way of revelation unless it is a foretelling by God's Spirit. Everything has to be proved and, a prophesy will be proved true or false with time. But a revelation regarding a principle of belief to be adapted must have solid biblical foundations.
Upvote
0