• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

YEC Statement of faith - YEC's only.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Micaiah

Well-Known Member
Dec 29, 2002
2,444
37
62
Western Australia
Visit site
✟2,837.00
Faith
Christian
How many YEC's agree with this statement of beliefs on Creation.
 

PotLuck

Active Member
May 5, 2002
253
3
Visit site
✟408.00
Faith
Christian
mhess13 said:
I would agree with that. However, many YEC's are hardcore KJV only translation and believe that the KJV is perfect. Dr. Kent Hovind would certainly take this position.
Hmm. Didn't know that about the KJV.
Don't know who Dr. Kent Hovind is either.
The term "Young Earth Creationist" is new to me also.

Was discipled by a fellow, name is Dennis, who was a "hardcore" bible believer though. We both had KJV and NIV that we used interchangably so as not to get into that mindset. You see, we're behind enemy lines as it were in the battle of the deception of mormonism. They "are hardcore KJV only translation and believe that the KJV is perfect." (well, sort of. You'd have to study their doctrines to know what I mean by that) We were after the message, the history (yes, Genesis also) ... in short, the truth. Later on I met the fellow who helped lead Dennis to the Lord, Curtis. Shortly after that I met the fellow who helped Curtis come to the Lord. Not one advocated KJV only.
Found a church home where the pastor taught the same things but again using the KJV, NIV or any other popular versions such as the Amplified Bible, the New American Standard and all the others. But still all taught creation as it is in the bible and can trace the age of our earth and man.
Anyway, it seems I've had a unique discipleship in that I never bumped into anyone using terms like YEC, OEC, TE etc. It was my understanding that if you believed ALL the bible, believed every word to be true then you were simply labeled "a believer".

A short time after Dennis and I first opened our bibles together I knew we were in enemy territory. Not against the people, but against the deception, the lie. We can not survive here as christians, as effective influence for God's Word, if all are not on the "same page". We fight against mormon "Progressive Revelation", mormon church hierarchy (to them it's restoration of the church) and in general mormon twisting of the bible. For us here in Salt Lake City the divisions I see here would be catastrophic. We could not stand. The deception would take full advantage. And I'm not just saying on an evangelical basis either. The LDS Church would not hesitate to use that against us, believe me.

Our only strength is taking the bible literally, every word. It's our rock. Without it there would be little christian influence in the mecca of mormonism.
 
Upvote 0

Micaiah

Well-Known Member
Dec 29, 2002
2,444
37
62
Western Australia
Visit site
✟2,837.00
Faith
Christian
PotLuck said:
It was my understanding that if you believed ALL the bible, believed every word to be true then you were simply labeled "a believer".


I tried to convey that in the first paragraph, without labouring the point too much.

Our only strength is taking the bible literally, every word.
Be careful. There are passages that are intended to be interpretted allegorically. eg

Many prophetic passages use a lot of allegory.eg.

You have to take each passage as it comes. In some prophesies it is hard to distinguish between the literal and allegorical. No such doubt exists in Genesis. It is a historical record of Creation.

We must take the plain truth of Scripture as God intended. Hence the words in the statement above.
 
Upvote 0

PotLuck

Active Member
May 5, 2002
253
3
Visit site
✟408.00
Faith
Christian
I had to leave right after that post but I'd like to add a couple things.

If this is a draft of a statement of faith then may I suggest a sentence to the effect that the bible is taken literally. That would also cover a few of the other sentences in the draft and may not be necessary shortening the document.

I find the literal interpretation to be highly effective for any and all attacks on one's stand for God here in mormon country. It's also very effective in teaching who Jesus is, His love for us and what He did on the cross. I also support GFA (Gospel For Asia) by sponsoring a native missionary in India. I get info from them and in all cases the bible is adhered to literally, including The Creation. So the same thing holds, taking the bible as literal is the only way to deal with Satan. There is no other option.
 
Upvote 0

PotLuck

Active Member
May 5, 2002
253
3
Visit site
✟408.00
Faith
Christian
We can't be split on issues of the bible here in Salt Lake as we are here on this forum. We would collapse, simple as that. That's the reality here. The forum here isn't the "real world" so-to-speak. Sure, there are those who read this forum and just about anything else out there on the net.
But when you're out there face to face with open bibles there's no room for division. It won't work. Not here.
 
Upvote 0

Micaiah

Well-Known Member
Dec 29, 2002
2,444
37
62
Western Australia
Visit site
✟2,837.00
Faith
Christian
Agree with you PotLuck. I wouldn't be accentuating those kind of differences in the church, especially in an area where there are few Christians.
 
Upvote 0

PotLuck

Active Member
May 5, 2002
253
3
Visit site
✟408.00
Faith
Christian
"Translations available today, while not perfect, are a very accurate record of the original manuscripts."

Agreed. Here's why it's important for me.

There have been times I've had to refer to those manuscripts, not often, but there are times it becomes necessary.
Case in point:

|v1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
(NewT:John 1:1)


The LDS church teaches the verse is in error and should read "and the Word was "a god". Mormon doctrine claims three Gods as "separate personages". , the Father, The Son and the Holy Ghost.

In another book of their scripture called "The Pearl of Great Price" it's taught that again the bible is erred. But they don't teach it to new members but to those who have accepted previous teachings.

Again I've had to refer to the manuscripts.

This is exactly as it appears in their text including "(the Gods)"

http://www.sacred-texts.com/mor/pgp/abr4.htm

-----------

Abraham Chapter 4.

3 And they (the Gods) said: Let there be light; and there was light.
4 And they (the Gods) comprehended the light, for it was bright; and they divided the light, or caused it to be divided, from the darkness.
5 And the Gods called the light Day, and the darkness they called Night. And it came to pass that from the evening until morning they called night; and from the morning until the evening they called day; and this was the first, or the beginning, of that which they called day and night.
6 And the Gods also said: ....

-----------

They believe this to be literal and is taught as such. So again, we must view Genesis as literal also or we will be presenting our case on two issues, myth AND translation. I don't think we'd stand a chance in that scenero.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.