Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
WSJ - American, Italian Hostages Killed in CIA Drone Strike in January
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Senator Cheese" data-source="post: 67420427" data-attributes="member: 346630"><p>While I wholeheartedly agree with you, I find it odd that this topic is always brought up in connection to <em>drones</em>. The German populace has developed such strong antipathies towards the word that they are staunchly supporting the development of military unmanned vehicles, instead favoring a "traditional" airforce.</p><p></p><p>I just don't understand it - is there any reason as to why drone strikes are more prone to produce collateral damage than manned bombers? Or does it have to do with the belief that drones are more eager to be employed, whereas actual manned bombing campaings would be subject to stricter risk-benefit analysis?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Senator Cheese, post: 67420427, member: 346630"] While I wholeheartedly agree with you, I find it odd that this topic is always brought up in connection to [I]drones[/I]. The German populace has developed such strong antipathies towards the word that they are staunchly supporting the development of military unmanned vehicles, instead favoring a "traditional" airforce. I just don't understand it - is there any reason as to why drone strikes are more prone to produce collateral damage than manned bombers? Or does it have to do with the belief that drones are more eager to be employed, whereas actual manned bombing campaings would be subject to stricter risk-benefit analysis? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
WSJ - American, Italian Hostages Killed in CIA Drone Strike in January
Top
Bottom