• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Wrongfully Convicted Brothers Settle for $17,000,000

OGM

Newbie
Mar 22, 2010
2,561
153
✟26,065.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
I saw this article today. I thought it was good that they were released and that they received some compensation.

Wrongfully Convicted Brothers Win $17,000,000 Settlement From NYC - The Root

I was thinking:

1) I am glad they were not executed.
2) It is sad it took the legal system so many years to correct this.
3) Is it time for a system to prosecute the original prosecutor and detective that was involved in the case?
 

Cute Tink

Blah
Site Supporter
Nov 22, 2002
19,570
4,622
✟147,891.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
1) Yup
2) Yup
3) I didn't see anything about the prosecutor being in on it. Is there more information on that front? The detective, if prosecution is not prohibited by statutes of limitations, then I would say, if investigation warrants it, prosecution should be explored.
 
Upvote 0

Belk

Senior Member
Site Supporter
Dec 21, 2005
30,711
15,176
Seattle
✟1,176,770.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
1) Yup
2) Yup
3) I didn't see anything about the prosecutor being in on it. Is there more information on that front? The detective, if prosecution is not prohibited by statutes of limitations, then I would say, if investigation warrants it, prosecution should be explored.


I am fairly certain the law is that you can not seek to prosecute either the detective or the prosecutor unless there is evidence of criminal intent. It was specifically set up so it would be very difficult in order to protect the process from people seeking retribution.
 
Upvote 0

MehGuy

A member of the less neotenous sex..
Site Supporter
Jul 23, 2007
56,278
11,033
Minnesota
✟1,362,157.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
There was this one guy who wanted to pass a law that the wrongly convicted should pay the government 1000 dollars for every year he/she spent in prison. Since they got board and rent for free when they didn't deserve it.

Made me sick to my stomach when I read that article.
 
Upvote 0

OGM

Newbie
Mar 22, 2010
2,561
153
✟26,065.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
There was this one guy who wanted to pass a law that the wrongly convicted should pay the government 1000 dollars for every year he/she spent in prison. Since they got board and rent for free when they didn't deserve it.

Made me sick to my stomach when I read that article.
Where was that?!
 
Upvote 0

OGM

Newbie
Mar 22, 2010
2,561
153
✟26,065.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
I am fairly certain the law is that you can not seek to prosecute either the detective or the prosecutor unless there is evidence of criminal intent. It was specifically set up so it would be very difficult in order to protect the process from people seeking retribution.
I know...I wonder if the process should be changed. I was thinking...

A prosecutor or police could be held for neglegence. Or even charged in some cases. Think about this; I could be disbarred or worse if I damaged my client due to my incompetence or bad behavior. If I handled funds improperly or told a client to do something very illegal, I could be charged. I was thinking a separate Federal division could go after prosecutors and police that obviously frame people, etc. The Feds now have certain powers but I don't feel it is enough in many cases to correct problems. The States are often slow and indifferent and just too political.
 
Upvote 0

Belk

Senior Member
Site Supporter
Dec 21, 2005
30,711
15,176
Seattle
✟1,176,770.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
I know...I wonder if the process should be changed. I was thinking...

A prosecutor or police could be held for neglegence. Or even charged in some cases. Think about this; I could be disbarred or worse if I damaged my client due to my incompetence or bad behavior. If I handled funds improperly or told a client to do something very illegal, I could be charged. I was thinking a separate Federal division could go after prosecutors and police that obviously frame people, etc. The Feds now have certain powers but I don't feel it is enough in many cases to correct problems. The States are often slow and indifferent and just too political.


It is an interesting idea. I feel that I lack enough specific knowledge to judge if it is a good idea or not. What has changed that the original intent of walling that off is no longer relevant?
 
Upvote 0

seven2014

Newbie
Dec 12, 2014
136
11
✟15,333.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
I saw this article today. I thought it was good that they were released and that they received some compensation.

Wrongfully Convicted Brothers Win $17,000,000 Settlement From NYC - The Root

I was thinking:

1) I am glad they were not executed.
2) It is sad it took the legal system so many years to correct this.
3) Is it time for a system to prosecute the original prosecutor and detective that was involved in the case?

I agree with all of your points. And we should have a system where the people you mentioned is investigated, and if found guilty should be held accountable.
 
Upvote 0