Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Worse than a non-voter is someone who holds their nose and only votes for a candidate in order to beat the other guy. It just perpetuates the cycle of Big Govt Option A versus Big Govt Option B. Better to take a stand and vote for who you believe is the best candidate (even if that means a third party) regardless of their chance of winning. And I for one couldn't care less if voting for a third party splits the vote for Big Govt Option A against Big Govt Option B.
Now that the religious right has endorsed Santorum, and vetted him as a Christian, I feel it's my responsibility to consider him over a mormon. Just sayin'...
Yep...well Romney shouldn't be making any mistakes...he's been running since when? 1996??? IDK for sure... but many times. I personally don't see much difference between his and Obama's plans/programs.
I couldn't disagree more, I'm in the ABO camp, (Anyone But Obama). Can't you see what this man, (Obama), is doing to our country? He is completely out of his league and incompetent as POTUS.
Yes the media is pushing Romney because it means that it will split the republican vote and ensure Mr. Obama'a re-election. The Dem's are counting on it and the media is all too happy to assist.Well, since it's still primary time, I'll reserve judgment that Romney is the only one who can beat Obama. I believe that if Santorum (or Paul, or Gingrich) is the person God wants to beat Obama, then I need to be open to that.
I really wonder if the media at large is pushing this idea that only Romney has a chance to beat Obama is a political--purely political--ploy. I've seen it all I think, and that would be something they'd do.
You are absolutely correct in your analysis.Unfortuantelly so is writing in a third party. Unless and untill a third party is strong enough to actually get a presidential candidate elected it is always going to split the republican vote and ensure the democrats a victory. Obama wants to run against Romney with everything that is in him precisely because he hopes to split the vote. He wants to negate the christian base of the republican party.
Candidates will say anything to get elected. You have to ask yourself, which political party do you trust more? If you want a socialist change in the USA similar to the European countries who are now relying on Chinese loans to prop them up, your choice is clear. However, if you want real reform of our pseudo-capitalist system, it may take more than one election. But the time to start is now otherwise we will drown in our own debt. There was only one candidate I really liked from the beginning, but she's no longer running and was probably unelectable anyway. I will vote against the Democrats and their agenda for whoever has the best chance to defeat them. If it's only an incrementally better change, that will be enough for me. I do not like the loss of hope and socialist change Obama that the Democrats have given us. It's time to say enough.Santorum's a wolf in sheep's clothing???? Why would the religious right sanction him then? (Or are you talking about Newt, as a RC?)
I think I might like Santorum -Paul ticket... let Paul take care of the issues at homeand Santorum put our world enemies on notice.
I don't trust Romney...you think the Iowa vote stuff isn't orchestrated?
Anyway... the Miami Herald ran a full page chart of what position each of them hold on the main issues...and frankly, Romney's is only different from Obama's in a few areas imo... and we all know how well Obama lied (lies.) Now if I can just trust The Miami Herald to not have slanted things again.
Sitting out the election is a vote for President Obama.
I'd agree with that analysis. A lot of people seem to be having all sorts of ethical problems with Gingrich, which puzzles me somewhat, because there isn't a one of us who hasn't had moral failings in their lives. Not to mention that the latest attack against him is proving to be nothing but lies and a blatantly obvious attempt to take him out, lest he actually win the nomination. Last night's debate performance (the opening bit) was amazing, as Newt pretty much handed John King his head AND his butt, over opening the Presidential debate with the charges against him, which Newt then categorically denied. I see here a man who has nothing to lose, so he's telling things like they are. I am impressed.
I would vote for Newt, warts and all, over Romney any day! And if it is Newt against Obama, I think Newt could win in a landslide. I think the Dems should be very, very worried (and I think they are).
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?