Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Side effect from eating a fruit. Provide some objective evidence for that fruit and I'll hold you in high opinion.
Animals does that too.
lets assume a planet is found and has life on it. it has bacteria, plant-like and protist-like organisms. it doesn't have animal-like organisms. that doesn't disprove evolution assuming transition is evident. evolution isn't a set path. its a divergent path. many possibilities. the occurrence of animal-like organisms isn't a definite.
What functions are you talking about? Life forms based on media other than carbon would not have the same bodily functions..What would silica eat?Without eating, why would it eliminate bodily waste? It would not need to eat..what would it eat in the first place?
Side effect from eating a fruit. Provide some objective evidence for that fruit and I'll hold you in high opinion.
I'm sorry, that isn't strong evidence. It's evidence that doesn't contradict your hypothesis at best.The evidence is that we WANT to put something over our bodies. It is such a strong scientific evidence to the once existed forbidden fruit.
I don't know. But I know it will EAT. And it will also [bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse]. That are functions.
The evidence is that we WANT to put something over our bodies. It is such a strong scientific evidence to the once existed forbidden fruit.
Because evolution will make that happen.
Not necessarily. If a planet like Mars can only support extremophile bacteria you aren't going to get any animals or other complex multicellular life. We don't have animals in the extreme conditions those bacteria survive in, so does that prove evolution wrong?
I'm sorry, that isn't strong evidence. It's evidence that doesn't contradict your hypothesis at best.
There are also people who don't want to put clothes on their bodies.
I know quite a few folks who would like nothing more than to run around naked..
A WANT is NOT a "scientific evidence".
Your answer is not tangible evidence.
The fact of wanting IS a scientific evidence.
And just like that you've made one of the most offensive posts I've seen yet. Congratulations.
I need proof of that little gem!
And just like that, Juvenissun makes an even more offensive post. Incredible.You said it. Offensive. Why is it offensive? Of course you know. Because they are naked. If they wear clothes, then there will be no offense at all. That is why human is different from animal.
I would spend more money for a ticket to see a bunch of animals that "want" to wear clothes every day.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?