Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Leisure and Society
Society
Technology
Windows 11?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Vince53" data-source="post: 76084957" data-attributes="member: 251704"><p>The Terrible Truth About Windows Upgrades</p><p></p><p>Windows XP, the queen of 32-bit systems, was built from the ground up to run on single-core 32-bit systems.</p><p></p><p>When MS introduced Vista, they neglected to mention that it was designed for dual-core 64-bit systems. They made it backwards-compatible and produced a disaster. As the internet raged over what a bad system Vista was, an off-brand company produced a low-powered budget laptop with Vista installed--and it ran great. Built from the ground up for Vista, its low-end dual-core CPU ran Vista just fine.</p><p></p><p>Requiring less power than Vista, Windows 7 ran even better. Requiring less power still, Windows 8 ran even better. And requiring even less power than any of them, Windows 10 ran the best of all.</p><p></p><p>But Windows 11 will require more power than any of them. Designed for new, powerful computers, it should run well on them. Otherwise, you will get an operating system that is not as good as Windows 10.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Vince53, post: 76084957, member: 251704"] The Terrible Truth About Windows Upgrades Windows XP, the queen of 32-bit systems, was built from the ground up to run on single-core 32-bit systems. When MS introduced Vista, they neglected to mention that it was designed for dual-core 64-bit systems. They made it backwards-compatible and produced a disaster. As the internet raged over what a bad system Vista was, an off-brand company produced a low-powered budget laptop with Vista installed--and it ran great. Built from the ground up for Vista, its low-end dual-core CPU ran Vista just fine. Requiring less power than Vista, Windows 7 ran even better. Requiring less power still, Windows 8 ran even better. And requiring even less power than any of them, Windows 10 ran the best of all. But Windows 11 will require more power than any of them. Designed for new, powerful computers, it should run well on them. Otherwise, you will get an operating system that is not as good as Windows 10. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Leisure and Society
Society
Technology
Windows 11?
Top
Bottom