Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Why Young Earthers should be more honest
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JohnR7" data-source="post: 680716" data-attributes="member: 782"><p>I guess your new here. If you make a claim, then usually they require you to present evidence. So where is your evidence that Dawin had anything to do with any of this stuff. For example genetics came 50 years later. Darwin had nothing to do with that at all. Oh, they may try to use some of darwins theorys as a means to explain their results, but that is just creative writing. The only thing that comes out of that is entertainment. </p><p></p><p>Darwin had absolutely nothing to do with animal husbandry, I can show you examples of that thousands of years before Darwin was even born. At least 3000 years before he was born. Even before Plato and Aristotle was born. Same thing with agriculture. The Amish were adapting plants to America and they never read Darwin, so there was no contrabution there either. </p><p></p><p>People were getting along just fine before Darwin came along. I have heard it said that the only thing in Darwins writting that has not been falsified is stuff he got from others anyways. </p><p></p><p>Oh, and the rules say no personal attacks on forum members. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>&nbsp;</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JohnR7, post: 680716, member: 782"] I guess your new here. If you make a claim, then usually they require you to present evidence. So where is your evidence that Dawin had anything to do with any of this stuff. For example genetics came 50 years later. Darwin had nothing to do with that at all. Oh, they may try to use some of darwins theorys as a means to explain their results, but that is just creative writing. The only thing that comes out of that is entertainment. Darwin had absolutely nothing to do with animal husbandry, I can show you examples of that thousands of years before Darwin was even born. At least 3000 years before he was born. Even before Plato and Aristotle was born. Same thing with agriculture. The Amish were adapting plants to America and they never read Darwin, so there was no contrabution there either. People were getting along just fine before Darwin came along. I have heard it said that the only thing in Darwins writting that has not been falsified is stuff he got from others anyways. Oh, and the rules say no personal attacks on forum members. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Why Young Earthers should be more honest
Top
Bottom