Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Why YEC leaders should not be believed without checking sources
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Calminian" data-source="post: 19975936" data-attributes="member: 100950"><p>I thought Humphreys was on staff with ICR. </p><p></p><p>Regardless, I find the gossip you are sharing about Ken Ham interesting. Unfortunately Ken is not here to give the context of his statements. It's easy to slander someone when they are not hear to defend themselves.</p><p></p><p>I'm also curious why you would want to sue someone over calling you a heretic. There are some that think I'm a heretic for some theological views I hold. It never dawned on me to sue them. Isn't that just a little silly?</p><p></p><p>Anyway, in the title of the thread you single out YECs. Shouldn't everyone be checked out before they are believed. The Acts 17:11 berean test shouldn't just be limited to YECs now should it?</p><p></p><p>Whether you are a heretic I don't know. That would depend on what you believe about the essentials of the christian faith. Compromiser is a fair title I believe. Are you going to sue me over that one? One can believe in evolution yet still believe the gospel. It would be illogical, but God's not going to judge you for being illogical.</p><p></p><p>What about self described christians the don't believe the resurrection is literal? Should they be labeled heretics and should the sue their labelers as well? </p><p></p><p>This whole litigation attitude seems very immature to me. Perhaps you could explain.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Calminian, post: 19975936, member: 100950"] I thought Humphreys was on staff with ICR. Regardless, I find the gossip you are sharing about Ken Ham interesting. Unfortunately Ken is not here to give the context of his statements. It's easy to slander someone when they are not hear to defend themselves. I'm also curious why you would want to sue someone over calling you a heretic. There are some that think I'm a heretic for some theological views I hold. It never dawned on me to sue them. Isn't that just a little silly? Anyway, in the title of the thread you single out YECs. Shouldn't everyone be checked out before they are believed. The Acts 17:11 berean test shouldn't just be limited to YECs now should it? Whether you are a heretic I don't know. That would depend on what you believe about the essentials of the christian faith. Compromiser is a fair title I believe. Are you going to sue me over that one? One can believe in evolution yet still believe the gospel. It would be illogical, but God's not going to judge you for being illogical. What about self described christians the don't believe the resurrection is literal? Should they be labeled heretics and should the sue their labelers as well? This whole litigation attitude seems very immature to me. Perhaps you could explain. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Why YEC leaders should not be believed without checking sources
Top
Bottom