Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Why YEC leaders should not be believed without checking sources
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Frumious Bandersnatch" data-source="post: 19966086" data-attributes="member: 7449"><p>Of course we can witness the annual varves that are laid down today and geologists can tell the differences between lamina that are varves and those that aren't. YECs have been playing this some lamina are not annual varves so no lamina that indicate ages beyond the YEC timeframe are annual varves for a long time. It is easy to see that their logic is totally false. It is logically equivalent to saying that some dogs are not black so no black animal can be a dog. The YEC claim in question is then like showing a picture of a black cat to prove that black animals can't be dogs. To someone who had never seen a dog or cat and desperately needed to believe that there were no black dogs this might be a convincing approach. </p><p> </p><p>F.B.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Frumious Bandersnatch, post: 19966086, member: 7449"] Of course we can witness the annual varves that are laid down today and geologists can tell the differences between lamina that are varves and those that aren't. YECs have been playing this some lamina are not annual varves so no lamina that indicate ages beyond the YEC timeframe are annual varves for a long time. It is easy to see that their logic is totally false. It is logically equivalent to saying that some dogs are not black so no black animal can be a dog. The YEC claim in question is then like showing a picture of a black cat to prove that black animals can't be dogs. To someone who had never seen a dog or cat and desperately needed to believe that there were no black dogs this might be a convincing approach. F.B. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Why YEC leaders should not be believed without checking sources
Top
Bottom