I love the book that this article was based upon - Square Peg. Great book and article.
Interesting article. Their characterization of Wesleyans is true, but it is important to understand that the article's point #6, "Usually a reliance upon Reformed (Calvinist) theology." does not flow both ways. Fundamentalists do rely on Reformed theology, but not all people who are Reformed are the cartoon character Fundamentalists portrayed here.
The problem is that, in a Post-Christian society (as western civilization has become), many of those bullet points* at the end of the article become gateways to allowing the culture to enter into Christianity and change the church into an extension of a culture that doesn't understand or even want the church.
I do agree that the real hard-core Fundies do turn the Word into an "it" and that bothers me as much now as it did when I was Wesleyan. I mean, it REALLY bothers me.
*For Wesleyans, God himself, not information about him, is the primary content of revelation.
The primary mistake of fundamentalism is that it permits the Word of God to become an it instead of a Who.
The irony in the contrast between fundamentalism and Wesleyan theology is that Wesleyans end up taking the Bible more seriously than do fundamentalists.
The principal difference between Wesleyans and fundamentalists springs from contrasting doctrines of Scripture and revelation.
The Bible uniquely and definitively tells the story of Gods self-disclosure and of humankinds response. But not everything in the Bible is essential to Gods self-disclosure.
For fundamentalists, revelation is thought of primarily as divine information or truth about God, humans, and the creation.
For Wesleyans, knowing the truth is primarily a matter of knowing God, of being transformed and gifted by him, and of being placed in his service.
Because Wesleyans dont lock the Bible into an artificially imposed perfection, the Bibles long and rich history of composition can be heard.