• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Why was the Hebrew word for 'fish' in Jonah 1:17 different from the one in the next verse?

tonychanyt

24/7 Christian
Oct 2, 2011
6,061
2,239
Toronto
Visit site
✟196,430.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Jona 1:

17 The LORD appointed a great fish to swallow up Jonah. And Jonah was in the belly of the fish three days and three nights.
Strong's Hebrew: 1709. דָּאג (dag) — 19 Occurrences

LXX used G2486 (ἰχθύς, ichthys).

The very next verse, Jon 2:

1 Then Jonah prayed to the LORD his God from the belly of the fish,
Strong's Hebrew: 1710. דָּגָה (dagah) — 15 Occurrences

Again, LXX used G2486.

The shift from masculine dag (Jonah 1:17) to feminine dagah (Jonah 2:1) served a literary purpose. It was a linguistic change in gender, not in biological sex. A big (masculine) fish swallowed Jonah. From the belly of the (feminine) fish, Jonah prayed to God. The semantics were the same; it was a stylistic variation. There was no theological difference. In LXX, they were the same Greek lemma G2486. In both verses, the word for 'belly' was masculine.

Jonah proceeded to pronounce his poem in 2:

2 “I called out to the Lord, out of my distress,
and he answered me;
out of the belly of Sheol I cried,
and you heard my voice.
Wiki:

In the book of Jonah chapter 1 verse 17, the Hebrew bible refers to the fish as dag gadol, "great fish", in the masculine. However, in chapter 2 verse 1, the word which refers to fish is written as dagah, meaning female fish. The verses therefore read: "And the lord provided a great fish (dag gadol, דָּג גּדוֹל, masculine) for Jonah, and it swallowed him, and Jonah sat in the belly of the fish (still male) for three days and nights; then, from the belly of the (dagah, דָּגָה, female) fish, Jonah began to pray."[14]
The shift from דָּג (dag) to דָּגָה (dagah) served as a deliberate stylistic choice in the narrative. In biblical Hebrew, nouns had grammatical gender (masculine or feminine), but this did not imply a real-world distinction in sex or biology. Instead, the alternation between masculine and feminine words enhanced the literary quality of the text by emphasizing different aspects of the same entity.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: Maori Aussie