Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Suffer what things? Luke tells us:18 Then one of them, whose name was Cleopas, answered him, “Are you the only stranger in Jerusalem who does not know the things that have taken place there in these days?” 19 He asked them, “What things?” They replied, “The things about Jesus of Nazareth,[h] who was a prophet mighty in deed and word before God and all the people, 20 and how our chief priests and leaders handed him over to be condemned to death and crucified him. 21 But we had hoped that he was the one to redeem Israel.[i] Yes, and besides all this, it is now the third day since these things took place.Again, you're reading too much into the text, projecting ideas that are not there. Luke tells us plainly that "these things" refer to the "chief priests" condemning to death and crucifying. This isn't God's wrath, it's the act of sinful men!
Blessed are the peacemakers,I believe both Catholics and Protestants will go to Heaven so no need to drag each other down!
God bless
That says nothing about the Father pouring out His Wrath on Jesus. To be "made sin" means "to be made a sin offering," nothing to do with undergoing God's wrath.
Blessed are the peacemakers,
for they shall be called the
"Children of God"
Most people don't realize that there are different views of the Atonement out there. Most Protestants (not all), especially Calvinists, believe in a form of Atonement called Penal Substitution. This view teaches that Jesus received the punishment the sinner deserved. Well, if the sinner deserves hellfire, then that's must be what Jesus endured in their place!
Butter pecan.
You have a good attitude.I once heard a greedy ole sinner once say, "you can catch more flies with honey than you can with manure."
Course his honey smelled a little funny.
Nuffin' like a butter pecan muffin'.
I'm purdy hard headed so the Lord had to thump me purdy hard.
Been awhile back.
So it just depends where yuh are and what's needed.
Reckon' it was allright to commend the guy trying to make peace, but it's hardly dragging somebody down when yer correcting them.
Guess I'm an ole meanie, but some uh these kids still need the rod.
The illegitimate ones that is.
...kindly show a few texts plainly showing the Father poured His Wrath out on Jesus.
I'm curious to see if Protestants really are faithful to that Sola Scriptura thing
I believe both Catholics and Protestants will go to Heaven so no need to drag each other down!
God bless
We're ALL wrong about God in some way. Sorry but it has to be said. We're ALL wrong about God in some way.
Not a newsflash at all. I agree with that. The point is, how is that anger/wrath dealt with? Is it dealt with by being appeased, or is it dealt with by venting that wrath on a substitute?This may come as a newsflash, but God is angry at sin.
Ex. 4:14; 15:7; Lev. 26:27-33; Num. 11:1; 12:9; 22:22; 25:3; Deut. 3:17; 29:24-29; Josh. 7:1; Judg. 2:14; 2 Sam. 24:1; 1 Kings 14:15; 15:30; 16:2; 25:53; 2 Kings 13:3; 17:11; 23:19; 1 Chron. 13:10; 2 Chron. 28:25; Ps. 7:11; 11:4-7; Heb. 10:27
As I noted earlier, the Greek here for "made sin" means "made a sin offering" as it's used in the OT. Even the language of "He who had no sin" recalls needing a sacrificial animal free of defect. The NASB and NIV in the footnote here even say "sin offering" for this verse.Jesus was made sin for us. The thing that God is angry at. He bore God's wrath.
This directly relates to the OT passages I posted above (e.g. Moses, Aaron, Phinehas), where the term "make atonement" corresponds to "turn away wrath"Next up, Propitiation: to make favorable by the appeasement of anger.
In this is love, not that we loved God, but that He loved us and sent His Son to be the propitiation for our sins. (1 John 4:10)
You did a great job of showing that Penal Substitution is not supported by scripture, but you have not given the alternative logical explanation to what happened with Christ going to the cross. There are huge problems with all the atonement theories we find in literature, so which do you subscribe to, so we can point out the weaknesses?Not a newsflash at all. I agree with that. The point is, how is that anger/wrath dealt with? Is it dealt with by being appeased, or is it dealt with by venting that wrath on a substitute?
As I noted earlier, the Greek here for "made sin" means "made a sin offering" as it's used in the OT. Even the language of "He who had no sin" recalls needing a sacrificial animal free of defect. The NASB and NIV in the footnote here even say "sin offering" for this verse.
But never did the OT sin offering receive God's wrath. That's what you've got to realize.
This directly relates to the OT passages I posted above (e.g. Moses, Aaron, Phinehas), where the term "make atonement" corresponds to "turn away wrath"
The atonement view I subscribe to is laid out in the link in the main post. I subscribe to this because it's a look at how the Bible itself uses the word atonement, so I don't have to really theorize. When the Bible uses the term atonement, it's basically understood to mean a good work is done by a hero that 'makes up for' the damage done by a sinner.You did a great job of showing that Penal Substitution is not supported by scripture, but you have not given the alternative logical explanation to what happened with Christ going to the cross. There are huge problems with all the atonement theories we find in literature, so which do you subscribe to, so we can point out the weaknesses?
You aren't helping your ethos with statements like this.which do you subscribe to, so we can point out the weaknesses?
This! We're ALL wrong about God in some way. Sorry but it has to be said. We're ALL wrong about God in some way.
That is almost close to yer username "Catholic Dude"Most people don't realize that there are different views of the Atonement out there. Most Protestants (not all), especially Calvinists, believe in a form of Atonement called Penal Substitution.
To understand the heart of salvation, THE CROSS, one must actually study the Bible on the matter and not blindly follow theologians:
http://catholicnick.blogspot.com/2010/07/atonement-according-to-scripture-more.html
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?