Warden_of_the_Storm
Well-Known Member
- Oct 16, 2015
- 15,386
- 7,544
- 31
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Deist
- Marital Status
- Single
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
This is an unprofitable statement because you give me no example of my 'creating statements without evidence'. I'm not going to go searching. It's up to you to provide my statements without evidence, including the post number.
OK, that's what you believe, we get it. I made the mistake of taking your question seriously, as if you really didn't know that the theory of evolution rules out such possibilities as sugar cane evolving into gum trees. My bad.
How do you know that sugar cane and gum trees don't belong to the same "kind?"You don't need the theory of evolution to rule it out. The Scriptures rule it out.
Not so!
Did I say that????
How do you know that sugar cane and gum trees don't belong to the same "kind?"
You denied that USincognito gave you evidence. He clearly did. You denied his evidence. Denial.
You didn't answer my question. If you continue to do this, I will not respond further.
If you point out his failings he'll threaten to report you then start ignoring you. But he'll never produce any evidence that isn't bible verses.Oh, I misunderstood. My bad.
Virtually every post you have added to this thread has been unsubstantiated and unevidenced, with you relying on appeals to emotion and your own incredulity about what the theory of evolution says to try and prove your points, and when it's been pointed out that you're wrong, you just double down and act rude.
If you point out his failings he'll threaten to report you then start ignoring you. But he'll never produce any evidence that isn't bible verses.
Been away for a while, come back and see the same 'arguments' against evolution.
And it is always... ALWAYS... 'arguments' against evolution.
NEVER arguments FOR creation/ID.
Analogies to human activity, bible verses, 'problems' with evolution - none of these, not one of them, is evidence FOR creation or ID.
It is almost as if creationists have admitted to themselves, subconsciously, that they cannot actually offer any positive supporting evidence FOR their mere beliefs, and are content to simply attack 'the other.' This is true, whether the creationist is a one-line snark master, or a verbose citation and quote bombing autodidact.
The same can be said of you. The burden of proof lies with you! Why don't you disprove the bible is true and that creation never happened.
No, that's merely a piece of friendly advice based on years of experience with pastors who think they're "debunking" evolution.
Yes I did in the portion of my post you excised in this response. Instead of copy and pasting it here, I'll just reiterate my refutation in a few bullet points.
1. Nebraska "man" was never claimed to be a human or human ancestor. Porcine molars are very similar to primate molars and it was mistakenly identified as that of an athropoid ape. It was not a fraud. As for the drawing, again, that was by a newspaper artist, not a scientist and Osborne, the promoter of the tooth, said of it, "a figment of the imagination of no scientific value, and undoubtedly inaccurate".
2. Piltdown was a fraud, but was questioned as early as 1913, a year after it was announced. It was also not widely accepted by German, French and American scientists. Finally Creationists didn't expose the fraud. it was exposed because more and more legitimate finds, including Taung child and Mrs. Ples contradicted the "big brain first" story that Pitldown suggested.
3. Ramapithecus, like Nebraska was a mistake, not a fraud, and like Piltdown, the mistake was realized because of more complete specimens were found showing that Sivapithecines were not human-like at all.
You denied that USincognito gave you evidence. He clearly did. You denied his evidence. Denial.
Oh, I misunderstood. My bad.
Virtually every post you have added to this thread has been unsubstantiated and unevidenced, with you relying on appeals to emotion and your own incredulity about what the theory of evolution says to try and prove your points, and when it's been pointed out that you're wrong, you just double down and act rude.
That has zero to do with the Nile River not being on in Egypt. That's your invention about me.
If you point out his failings he'll threaten to report you then start ignoring you. But he'll never produce any evidence that isn't bible verses.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?