Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Amazing, claiming science is myopic while using blind faith.Only to a point -- then your myopic science hits a snag it can't get around.
Let's make it tougher: much tougher.
It's the end of Day One of the creation week.
The only physical object in existence is a mass of sea water in the hollow of God's hand.
If one drop of that water was transported forward in time and put right in front of your for testing, what evidence would you look for to conclude it came into existence ex nihilo?
I say you have no evidence whatsoever.
What say you?
Nope, that is a false dichotomy.If I'm not mistaken wouldn't a good argument or evidence against evolution point to creationism? What other option would there be? Is there a third party? Its either creationism or evolution, right? If creationism is outside the realms of our science then science can neither prove or disprove it. therefor to make an argument for creationism would be to argue against evolution because evolution is in the realms of science.
You are being very disingenuous.
Your OP is quite provocatively untrue.
As for evidence that creation by God is true, we are surrounded by it.
Open your eyes and your mind to the truth of creation.
Not only the marvels of this planet and its life but also a wonderful universe of ever
revealing complexities.
I do not need to defend creation for it is a given truth, unfortunately not seen nor believed by
those that are blind.
No actually it is evolutionists who have a hard time defending their myths and fairytales that
all this came from nothing because it: could? wanted to? by chance?
The day evolutionists can show me some real tangible evidence that can prove the myth of
the evolution of life, species and myself, I will show you little green men on Mars.
I would suggest you check out Reason to Believe's creation model, which does supply predictions.
Reasons To Believe : Origin-of-Life Predictions Face Off: Evolution vs. Biblical Creation
Reasons To Believe : Creation Model Passes Big Test
You guys are so so righteous and smug.
Yet in the end you have no evidence.
After 200 years of Darwinism there is still no real tangible evidence for evolution.
Your "evidence" is still only supposition and a fanciful hypothesis at best.
At worst it is the deliberate and fraudulent manufacture of false science to give some
credence to a lie.
Nothing has changed since the Piltdown Man Hoax ... it still continues with another fraud 'Lucy'
You guys are so so righteous and smug.
Yet in the end you have no evidence.
After 200 years of Darwinism there is still no real tangible evidence for evolution.
Your "evidence" is still only supposition and a fanciful hypothesis at best.
At worst it is the deliberate and fraudulent manufacture of false science to give some
credence to a lie.
Nothing has changed since the Piltdown Man Hoax ... it still continues with another fraud 'Lucy'
That is obviously false; since many myths are contradictory, they can't all be factual.A myth is simply a fact you choose to not believe.
You guys are so so righteous and smug.
Yet in the end you have no evidence.
After 200 years of Darwinism there is still no real tangible evidence for evolution.
Your "evidence" is still only supposition and a fanciful hypothesis at best.
At worst it is the deliberate and fraudulent manufacture of false science to give some
credence to a lie.
Nothing has changed since the Piltdown Man Hoax ... it still continues with another fraud 'Lucy'
The one and only thing creationists are good at is singing to themselves the song they wrote themselves, and which they want to hear.
I would suggest you check out Reason to Believe's creation model, which does supply predictions.
Reasons To Believe : Origin-of-Life Predictions Face Off: Evolution vs. Biblical Creation
Reasons To Believe : Creation Model Passes Big Test
I dunno, if a creationist can show that the first life was complex (after giving a definition of complex) they would be moving in the right direction.Impressive predictions.
I won't offer an in depth critique of that article today as I'm on my phone. Suffice to say it misrepresents research into abiogenesis (1950s experiments failed!) and expresses incredulity that abiogenesis could occur.
- Life appeared early in Earth’s history.
- Life appeared under harsh conditions.
- Life miraculously persisted under harsh conditions.
- Life arose quickly.
- Life in its minimal form is complex.
Positive evidence for biblical creation is notable by it's absence.
Merely making a few vague statements based on the discoveries of science is not 'making predictions'.
At worst it is the deliberate and fraudulent manufacture of false science to give some credence to a lie.
Nothing has changed since the Piltdown Man Hoax ... it still continues with another fraud 'Lucy'
It's diabolical, isn't it?But evolution? I don't get it. There is no reason to foster the 'lie' that creationists claim it is.
That is obviously false; since many myths are contradictory, they can't all be factual.
The advantage of a supernatural explanation is that you can claim any old nonsense is a fact. The disadvantage of a supernatural explanation is that you can claim any old nonsense is a fact.
And so can anyone else; consequently all supernatural explanations are equally valid and equally useless. Pick the one you feel most comfortable with (typically the one you grew up with) and reject the others, other than making you feel better, it makes no difference.
It's diabolical, isn't it?
No.The need for creationists to foster the belief that evolution is a 'lie'?
I claim there is a reason: a diabolical reason.There is no reason to foster the 'lie' that creationists claim it is.
Evolution is a lie of the devil, and he will use it to get scientists to take the Mark during the Tribulation period.
In my opinion.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?