• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Why is the section "broken"?

good4u

<font color="darkblue"><font size="3"><b><i><font
Apr 4, 2003
1,458
47
65
St. Louis, MO
Visit site
✟1,875.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
I don't get this...

What did they do to this section of the forum?

Why is this broken into a million little denom sections?

Can't we discuss t-o-g-e-t-h-e-r?

Geez...

Can't anyone help? I am sooooo confused>>>>>
 

tigersnare

Angry Young Calvinist
Jul 8, 2003
1,358
23
42
Baton Rouge, LA
✟1,636.00
Faith
Calvinist
good4u said:
I don't get this...

What did they do to this section of the forum?

Why is this broken into a million little denom sections?

Can't we discuss t-o-g-e-t-h-e-r?

Geez...

Can't anyone help? I am sooooo confused>>>>>

1. What don't you get?

2. It's not broken into a million little denom sections, it's broken into a few represenative rooms to cover the multitude of denominations, and in my opinion it was done very well.

3. Yes we can discuss t-o-g-e-t-h-e-r, but it is a very welcome change to have like minds in one forum. Gone are the days that we can't discuss our own doctrines and theology without having to defend it around every corner.

4. What's the confussion for?
 
Upvote 0

BBAS 64

Contributor
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
10,057
1,804
60
New England
✟622,336.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
good4u said:
I am the lone dissenter and I do not "fit" any of these...

So I guess the time has come to leave this section.

The writing is on the wall.

Farewell.
Good 4u

You can use the non-denom it is p/r/e just renamed.

Bill
 
Upvote 0

A. believer

Contributor
Jun 27, 2003
6,196
216
64
✟29,960.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
BBAS 64 said:
Good 4u

You can use the non-denom it is p/r/e just renamed.

Bill
I don't particularly care for how it's been divided up, although I do see some benefits and I understand why some people like it. But some of the people in the non-denom forum don't like it that people consider it equivalent to the old PRE. The non-denom forum, they feel, is for people who are part of independent, unaffiliated churches, and they don't like it to be used as a free for all. They feel as if they don't have a place of their own.
 
Upvote 0