Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Trust that Jesus will protect you.Not too sure if I want to go where the Lamb with the 7 eyes and 7 horns dwell along with the 4 living animal-human hybrid creatures. Oh that's right, Revelations calls it the new heaven. So I guess all the Bible is true, except for the large chunk they removed some 120 years ago..........
How is that logic to show the Bible is errant or inerrant? Because you 'think' there should be more?The thing that i noticed is the lack of more epistles in the bible. Surely the apostles wrote more letters than we have now
What canon existed at the time of Christ that was Greek? This is news to me. Please provide sources.There are even more OBVIOUS references to Christ in the missing books. Wisdom of Solomon identifying that the weeping prophecied in Jeremiah would be caused by a decree commanding the murder of "holy innocents" (Early Jewish texts call children that), for example. The fact is, there was one canon of Scripture in the time of Christ, comprised of books that had been written in Hebrew and Greek, all of which existed in the Greek, but not all in the Hebrew.
It sounds like a conspiracy.The large chunk of Scripture that 1800 years worth of Christians universally called Scripture that Protestants couldn't reconcile their doctrines with, so rather than change their doctrines to fit Scripture, they changed Scripture to fit their doctrines. They decided to use what is the true deuterocanon of the Old Testament, a canon designed by Jews asking "how do I remove Christ from these so that Jews won't find Christianity?"
Thank you very much for that ^^ explanation! How could the original authors have detected errors, though?
Where are you getting this from? Have you ever even read what Paul wrote? This is ubsurd.
We know that during the period of the early church that there were many copies to which they could compare. During this early period of the Church, many Christians were being put to death for the Scriptures they were trying to protect, and so were motivated to make sure that the copies that they would give their life to protect were genuine. In some cases Christians would keep unreliable copies to give to the authorities who were trying to destroy the Scriptures, while keeping well hidden the ones they knew were genuine.
I believe that all scripture is inspired by God, not any man or culture.As a result, modern theologians, trained within the Greek church, admit that they cannot reproduce the exegesis of the NT authors. Some are still so arrogant to say that if Jesus and his apostles were in their Hermeneutics 101 classes they would fail for misapplying scripture.
As a result, the church is void of the rich Hebrew nature of the scriptures. They even missed the plain teaching of the Bible, which is love; even of our enemies.
I believe that all scripture is inspired by God, not any man or culture.
I also do not see how you or anyone can say that the scriptures are devoid of the Hebrew nature, the book of Hebrews is devoted to the Hebrews who then believed Christ and how the Old Testament and the New Testament fit together.
I don't see it.
Who cares if the Greek expositor see's or does not see what the parable means? It doesn't change what Paul wrote. He wrote in Greek, the language. I'm not sure what someone Greek has to do with Paul writing in a certain language.I did not say the scriptures were.. I said the Greek interpretation of them was.
Please refer to the example given with the parable of the mustard seed and find a single Greek expositor who sees the meaning of Christ in it.
It isn't necessar to believe the Bible has no errors. That's a very recent idea.Asked this on another forum, and thought I'd ask it here, too.
Just curious on this point. If men were responsible for taking 'God's word' and putting it to paper, could it be that somewhere along the way, there were errors? That parts of the Bible might not be free from corruption? It requires faith to believe in the overall message of the Bible, and it requires the belief in God's grace to have a relationship with Christ...and to me, experiencing the Holy Spirit is all we truly 'need,' so why is it necessary to believe that the Bible is the inerrant Word of God?
I ask this because as I'm exploring churches, their 'mission statement' is wrapped up in believing that the Bible has no errors. (errors of man)
What do you think?
Asked this on another forum, and thought I'd ask it here, too.
Just curious on this point. If men were responsible for taking 'God's word' and putting it to paper, could it be that somewhere along the way, there were errors? That parts of the Bible might not be free from corruption? It requires faith to believe in the overall message of the Bible, and it requires the belief in God's grace to have a relationship with Christ...and to me, experiencing the Holy Spirit is all we truly 'need,' so why is it necessary to believe that the Bible is the inerrant Word of God?
I ask this because as I'm exploring churches, their 'mission statement' is wrapped up in believing that the Bible has no errors. (errors of man)
What do you think?
Do you believe the earliest copies in their original languages contains errors or translations to English that have different levels of difficulty and readability? Just curious.It is not necessary. The bible does contain errors. What we should believe is that the bible is inspired by God and that it conveys the truth of God's revelation.
Errors. The creation accounts and other early events simply aren't historically accurate.Do you believe the earliest copies in their original languages contains errors or translations to English that have different levels of difficulty and readability? Just curious.
I believe in the original version and the King James mostly, but I enjoy the NASB and ESV at times too.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?