Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Let me guess, you're a GNN person. If it ain't Communist, it ain't fair and balanced!
How much more Left do you want Obama to be? LOL
the guy votes far left in almost everything, he has no Allegiance whatsoever to America, his wife has said she only recently started being proud of America because Barry was nominated, Hillary and other people have lawsuits going against Barry because he isn't technically a U.S. Citizen, he doesn't think America is a great country at all, and he has slipped up about his "Muslim faith" on numerous occasions.. I would at least think that Hillary would be a better President than Obama because at least I know where her allegiance is, but with Barry you get no such thing, he is a Radical through and through, so are his friends, and his former Spiritual Mentor may as well have been Yusef Bey, the now deceased leader of the Your Black Muslim Bakery fame Black Supremacists.
pretty typical Republican response.
You're either one of us or you're a terrorist/communist! there's just no concept of holding a ballanced view.
No, you could be a centrist, a socialist, a theocrat, a libertarian, or just someone who doesn't care.
I would say that other sources of news are also subject to as much or more bias. You need to go to primary sources of information, which Fox's website provides on some hot-button issues. They'll link you to transcripts and documents.Well, if I said that I was a Libertarian, and that I don't like one or more political parties using news networks to promote their own drivel, what would you say to that.
Or the BBCI would say that other sources of news are also subject to as much or more bias. You need to go to primary sources of information, which Fox's website provides on some hot-button issues. They'll link you to transcripts and documents.
I would say that other sources of news are also subject to as much or more bias. You need to go to primary sources of information, which Fox's website provides on some hot-button issues. They'll link you to transcripts and documents.
Or the BBC
Every media source is biased.
It's called the "We need to make money" bias.
I don't think the bias is quite comparable to any of the networks in the US. Whilst it may creep in I still feel the BBC at least attempts to be neutral and objective.That doesn't get rid of bias. In fact, I would charge that the BBC has a liberal agenda bias.
Most news organizations claim to be, but as Bernard Goldberg documented in "Bias," most newsies are liberal elites who are too liberal and too arrogant to see their own bias. I don't see why this would be different across the pond, and I've seen bias in BBC reporting.I don't think the bias is quite comparable to any of the networks in the US. Whilst it may creep in I still feel the BBC at least attempts to be neutral and objective.
Do you know of one that is better?Most news organizations claim to be, but as Bernard Goldberg documented in "Bias," most newsies are liberal elites who are too liberal and too arrogant to see their own bias. I don't see why this would be different across the pond, and I've seen bias in BBC reporting.
Fox. They try to get both left and right in there (at least mainstream left and mainstream right).Do you know of one that is better?
Actually, the media machine would be doing its best to [bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse] al-Gore and whatever he would have done. I'm glad we didn't get that. What happened after Afghanistan is another argument entirely.And yet, most news seems to show a conservative bias.
If 9/11 had happened with a Democrat in office, the media would have gone into VICIOUS ATTACK MODE.
The American economy, finance and housing market has gone completely into the toilet on Dubya's watch, massive job losses (24,000 possible bank jobs in the UK todays paper reads) and a recession on its way. Bush failed to regulate the industry and now its imploding on itself and look at his defence policy!!! Iraq, what a great plan that was!!
American Politics 101
In America we have three branches of government. The Executive Branch (the President), the Legislative Branch (Congress) and the Judicial Branch (the Courts).
The Legislature is the branch of our government that makes the laws.
Now that you know the basic set-up of American government, maybe you can rethink what you want to blame on George W. Bush.
And please keep in mind while you do that... Congress has been a Democratic majority for a while now.
It is NOT the job of the President of the United States to "regulate the industry". In fact... Constitutionally speaking... that's not the government's job at all. Not any branch of the government. Although Congress has been doing it for years and years now and has little by little amassed more power and control than the Fed gov't ever should have had while whittling away at the free market, state's rights and individual's rights.
What we've seen in the last few weeks with Fannie Mae is blatantly unconstitutional - the Federal Government was NOT granted the right or the power in the Constitution to do what it did. And I for one, as a taxpayer and citizen of this country, am OUTRAGED that our government sees fit to try to "regulate" industry by bailing out failing companies with MY money.
And I lay the blame for that equally on Congress and the President, Democrats and Republicans.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?