Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Nor do you give evidence for all of creation being the result of only naturalistic mechanisms acting on a single life form from long long ago.
Is this supposed to be some sort of support for your God breathed a soul into the first man? I would have thought your reading comprehension of the Bible would be better than your reading comprehension of posts on the internet.Gen 2:7 And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.
1Co_15:45 And so it is written, The first man Adam was made a living soul; the last Adam was made a quickening spirit.
I already answered this.Look at the fossil record distributed throughout the geologic column exactly in a manner we would expect to describe evolution.
I have posed this question to you and many others time and time again. Explain the fossil record without evolution.
It certainly is, and my decision is to follow your lead in how to treat another person's presentation in a discussion.Treat me however you wish. That's your decision.
I await with bated breath your presentation of some actual criticism rather than unevidenced assertion.Oh...and criticism of the atheistic creationist worldview isn't going away.
I already answered this.
When God was cleaning up the mess from the Flood, He had to put the bodies somewhere.
Since He is a very orderly being, He decided to group the dead bodies in sedimentary layers in the ground. Well, He had to move those layers anyway to get rid of the Flood mess.
So, He put animals that were similar in the same layers so that it looked like a rainbow of sorts. You know, a spectrum of continuity from one layer to another. God is fond of rainbows.
Easy peasy
You were taught that all of creation was the result of only naturalist mechanisms weren't you?
Nope, nothing has been offered to support the atheistic creationist viewpoint.
Look at the fossil record distributed throughout the geologic column exactly in a manner we would expect to describe evolution.
I have posed this question to you and many others time and time again. Explain the fossil record without evolution.
Is this supposed to be some sort of support for your God breathed a soul into the first man? I would have thought your reading comprehension of the Bible would be better than your reading comprehension of posts on the internet.
Upon further reflection, I realize that is not possible.
1 Cor 15:45 specifically states that Adam was made (formed, built) with a living soul. That means when God took the dust and built the man, the soul was inside it. God then animated the body by breathing life into it. The soul was inside waiting for the animation of the body.
There is no support for your contention that our soul consists of God's nasal exhalation.
This is the reaction that's so common within the atheistic creationist community which isn't addressing the issue. The issue is concerning the impetus, the power, the force, the mechanism which acted upon a single life form from long long ago which resulted in humanity existing today. What mechanism, what power, what impetus created (and yes it was a creative process) humanity? Why does humanity exist?
Do you understand that the question is about the causation of humanity from a single life form of long long ago....or causation of all the complexity and variety of life we observe today?
You have aptly demonstrated you have shovelfuls of no evidence. That's because there's no evidence and it exists only in your imagination.
It certainly is, and my decision is to follow your lead in how to treat another person's presentation in a discussion.
I await with bated breath your presentation of some actual criticism rather than unevidenced assertion.
This is the reaction that's so common within the atheistic creationist community which isn't addressing the issue. The issue is concerning the impetus, the power, the force, the mechanism which acted upon a single life form from long long ago which resulted in humanity existing today. What mechanism, what power, what impetus created (and yes it was a creative process) humanity?
Why does humanity exist?
Do you understand that the question is about the causation of humanity from a single life form of long long ago....or causation of all the complexity and variety of life we observe today?
No. The word 'only' never came up.
What evidence do you have of a force behind evolution?
If you have none you do know how the Null Hypothesis instructs us to deal with your empty claim, don't you?
Nope, nothing has been offered to support the atheistic creationist viewpoint.
No, again you are clueless. I have demonstrated that you are afraid. Terribly, terribly afraid. If I was given a similar challenge I would take it.
Why are you so afraid?
Something created humanity, we're sure of that. It depends on what one's faith-based belief system is as to what force created humanity.
I know your 'mountains of evidence' has been null so far. I expect your evidence will continue to be null (as in zero value).
What other impetus was presented other than only, totally, completely, solely naturalistic mechanisms which acted on a single life form from long long ago and created the complexity and variety of life we observe today.
Anything? Anything at all?
Throw another shovelful of nothing on your 'mountains of evidence'.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?